Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
ProkBERT-mini-long† as evaluated in the cited study. Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Precision; XML row13 column2Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Precision; XML row13 column2Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 6 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| ProkBERT-mini-long†: Genome-wide prophage detection Pipeline: ProkBERT-mini-long†Protocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection)Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.579 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column F1; XML row13 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.599 MCC Unit: unitless · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column MCC; XML row13 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.989 Specificity Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Specificity; XML row13 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.654 Precision Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Precision; XML row13 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.636 Recall Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Recall; XML row13 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.011 FPR Unit: fraction · Direction: lower | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column FPR; XML row13 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-model-0996ef6d1e7e0b03eeTrace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label Individual claims | LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Precision; XML row13 column2 Version: PMC13041943.1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Introduction ProkBERT-mini-long† as evaluated in the cited study. Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label Individual claims | LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models Table 5., row ProkBERT-mini-long†, column Precision; XML row13 column2 Version: PMC13041943.1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: paper-model-0996ef6d1e7e0b03ee