Result

67% ligand_pass_rate

ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops) · ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses reported comparison msa · Ligand pass rate

Tested configuration: ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops)
Protocol: ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses reported comparison msa: Runs N’ Poses ligand pass rate (MSA)
Dataset subset: Runs N’ Poses complete-case intersection: 2,573 scored ligands (ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses reported comparison split)
Related family profiles: ESMFold2
Procedure: Runs N’ Poses receptor–ligand co-folding; source benchmark 2,600 systems. Figure 2C reports n=2,573 scored ligands on the intersection where all models produced valid predictions, after excluding undefined SuCOS scores. Multiple ligands in one system are scored independently. Five seeds × five diffusion samples per target; select top candidate by ipTM. Success requires lDDT-PLI >0.8 and BiSyRMSD <2 angstrom. Baselines use 10 recycles and 200 diffusion steps; ESMFold2 uses 10 or 20 loops as labelled and truncated 68-step diffusion. Single-sequence and MSA conditions remain separate.
Evaluation: ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops) on ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses reported comparison msa: Runs N’ Poses ligand pass rate (MSA)
Coverage: unit: ligands; scored: 2573; eligible: unreported; note: Complete-case intersection; source 2600 systems is not a ligand denominator.
Uncertainty: Not reported
Evidence: Author-reported evaluation · source checkedESMFold2 primary paper v1, Figure 2C Runs N’ Poses · PDF page 5, Figure 2C, Runs N’ Poses subpanel (right), msa block, bar 10 from left (ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops)), exact printed bar label

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split: Not reported
Adaptation: Not reported
Scoring implementation: Ligand pass rate

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Access requirements and official instructions: ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses reported comparison msa: Runs N’ Poses ligand pass rate (MSA)

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Reported result 67 Individual claims	ESMFold2 primary paper v1, Figure 2C Runs N’ Poses Original source ↗ PDF page 5, Figure 2C, Runs N’ Poses subpanel (right), msa block, bar 10 from left (ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops)), exact printed bar label Version: 10.64898/2026.06.03.729735v1; posted 2026-06-04 Retrieved: 2026-09-23T11:22:04.378019+00:00	source checked Transcription of exact printed numerical labels in the complete Figure 2C Runs N’ Poses subpanel; visual original-PDF verification; no graph digitization · 2026-09-23 author reported Audit details Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied. Field: `attributes.printed_value` Source artifact SHA-256: `aacaf8d2c9af44cf148138b195175f2751295197bd5e3352ca6f1387059a7127` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact Extraction artifact SHA-256: `aacaf8d2c9af44cf148138b195175f2751295197bd5e3352ca6f1387059a7127` Extraction artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release history

ESMFold2 primary paper v1, Figure 2C Runs N’ Poses · Original source · 10.64898/2026.06.03.729735v1; posted 2026-06-04

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: esmfold2-2026-runs-n-poses-result-esmfold2-msa-10-loops-msa-ligand-pass-rate

areas: proteins-complexes
tasks: Runs N’ Poses ligand pass rate (MSA)
metric: ligand_pass_rate
metric direction: higher
unit: percent
printed value: 67
numeric value: 67
uncertainty: Not reported
source locator: PDF page 5, Figure 2C, Runs N’ Poses subpanel (right), msa block, bar 10 from left (ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops)), exact printed bar label
missing metadata: denominator: unextracted; seeds: unreported
review: method: Transcription of exact printed numerical labels in the complete Figure 2C Runs N’ Poses subpanel; visual original-PDF verification; no graph digitization; reviewer: Codex automated source review; date: 2026-09-23; artifact sha256: aacaf8d2c9af44cf148138b195175f2751295197bd5e3352ca6f1387059a7127; retrieval url: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.03.729735v1.full.pdf; notes: Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.
scored count: 2573
coverage: unit: ligands; scored: 2573; eligible: unreported; note: Complete-case intersection; source 2600 systems is not a ligand denominator.
evidence overlap: One receptor-ligand comparison reported at two conditioning modes and multiple inference settings; not independent benchmark replications.

Related records

evaluation: ESMFold2 (MSA, 10 loops) on ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses reported comparison msa: Runs N’ Poses ligand pass rate (MSA)

Suggest a correction