rewire.it
Benchmark

Plant Genomic Benchmark (PGB)

Plant genomic evaluations introduced with AgroNT. This release contains the complete promoter and terminator comparison tables from Figure 3e and 3f; other tasks remain unextracted.

24 evaluations · 24 metric rows

Overview

Plant genomic evaluations introduced with AgroNT. This release contains the complete promoter and terminator comparison tables from Figure 3e and 3f; other tasks remain unextracted.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

PGB promoter strength maize protoplasts: A. thaliana: promoter strength prediction

r2 (coefficient of determination) · Higher values are better.

Every method PGB promoter strength reports on promoter strength prediction, scored with R² on promoter strength test sequences: maize protoplasts: A. thaliana.

PGB promoter strength maize protoplasts: A. thaliana: promoter strength prediction · promoter strength test sequences: maize protoplasts: A. thaliana (PGB promoter strength split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

AgroNT Figure 3e source table · Fig3_panele.txt, column R2, maize protoplasts: A. thaliana; Methods Sec21

Author-reported R² values, source checked but not independently reproduced. No uncertainty is supplied in these tables.

All comparison limitations (3)
  • Author-reported R² values, source checked but not independently reproduced. No uncertainty is supplied in these tables.
  • Compare only within the same task, assay system and sequence class. No aggregate across these conditions is reported here.
  • Exact fitted checkpoint hashes, seeds and scoring denominators have not been established for these source rows.

Automated source review: 2026-09-23.

No unavailable values; missing scores remain labelled and are never plotted as zero.

Showing 2 of 2 matching rows.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 24 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

Baseline status by linked protocol

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run this benchmark

Choose a concrete protocol before running an evaluation. Its inputs, split and scoring rules determine which results can be compared.

Run this benchmark

The paper describes IA3 fine-tuning on 170 bp sequences using the original studies' train/test datasets. Rewire has no maintained runner for this benchmark. Exact fitted checkpoints, split manifests and execution settings have not been verified; these reported scores are not a reproduction recipe.

A maintained rewire runner has not been verified for this benchmark. Check data access, weights, licences, dependencies and hardware in the linked official documentation; requirements have not been fully extracted.

AgroNT: published methods and Figure 3 · Methods: Fine-tuning strategy (Sec16), Promoter and terminator strength prediction (Sec21); Figure 3 caption
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: agront-2024-plant-genomic-benchmark

areas
genomics
entity level
suite
source locator
Methods: Fine-tuning strategy (Sec16), Promoter and terminator strength prediction (Sec21); Figure 3 caption
run documentation
record id: agront-2024-plant-genomic-benchmark; status: source_reviewed_not_executed; source ids: agront-2024-paper-methods; source locator: Methods: Fine-tuning strategy (Sec16), Promoter and terminator strength prediction (Sec21); Figure 3 caption; summary: The paper describes IA3 fine-tuning on 170 bp sequences using the original studies' train/test datasets. Rewire has no maintained runner for this benchmark. Exact fitted checkpoints, split manifests and execution settings have not been verified; these reported scores are not a reproduction recipe.
missing metadata
runner: unavailable; split manifest: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction