rewire.it
Protocol

PGB terminator strength tobacco leaves: A. thaliana: terminator strength prediction

terminator strength prediction. Scored with R² on terminator strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana. 170 bp assay sequences; original study train/test datasets, as described in Methods Sec21. R² is scored separately by assay system and sequence class. Fitted model checkpoint, seeds and scored counts are not established here.

2 evaluations · 2 metric rows

Overview

terminator strength prediction. Scored with R² on terminator strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana. 170 bp assay sequences; original study train/test datasets, as described in Methods Sec21. R² is scored separately by assay system and sequence class. Fitted model checkpoint, seeds and scored counts are not established here.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

PGB terminator strength tobacco leaves: A. thaliana: terminator strength prediction

r2 (coefficient of determination) · Higher values are better.

Every method PGB terminator strength reports on terminator strength prediction, scored with R² on terminator strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana.

PGB terminator strength tobacco leaves: A. thaliana: terminator strength prediction · terminator strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana (PGB terminator strength split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

AgroNT Figure 3f source table · Fig3_panelf.txt, column R2, tobacco leaves: A. thaliana; Methods Sec21

Author-reported R² values, source checked but not independently reproduced. No uncertainty is supplied in these tables.

All comparison limitations (3)
  • Author-reported R² values, source checked but not independently reproduced. No uncertainty is supplied in these tables.
  • Compare only within the same task, assay system and sequence class. No aggregate across these conditions is reported here.
  • Exact fitted checkpoint hashes, seeds and scoring denominators have not been established for these source rows.

Automated source review: 2026-09-23.

No unavailable values; missing scores remain labelled and are never plotted as zero.

Showing 2 of 2 matching rows.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
2

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
agront-2024-plant-genomic-benchmark
Individual claims
AgroNT Figure 3f source table

Original source ↗

Fig3_panelf.txt, column R2, tobacco leaves: A. thaliana; Methods Sec21

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 78ec8156c2ffb3e5475277fdb7eb603294224e53
Retrieved: 2026-09-23

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:agront-2024-plant-genomic-benchmark

Claim: agront-2024-fig3f-association-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana

Source artifact SHA-256: 2a72d3cfd8c0cd5611ef91f0fd5e3e958aec55e2abb58773992b677b3fb9f1ef

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Relationship: part of
agront-2024-plant-genomic-benchmark
Individual claims
AgroNT: published methods and Figure 3

Original source ↗

Fig3_panelf.txt, column R2, tobacco leaves: A. thaliana; Methods Sec21

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Version of record, 2024-07-09; retrieved XML snapshot
Retrieved: 2026-09-23

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:agront-2024-plant-genomic-benchmark

Claim: agront-2024-fig3f-association-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana

Source artifact SHA-256: bcc1ad6d01ce59853d4e81c9d097427d2115c392ee51cf41d06bd4434cf1d378

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: agront-2024-fig3f-task-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana

areas
genomics
tasks
terminator strength prediction
metric
metric direction
higher
dataset
terminator strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana
protocol
170 bp assay sequences; original study train/test datasets, as described in Methods Sec21. R² is scored separately by assay system and sequence class. Fitted model checkpoint, seeds and scored counts are not established here.
source locator
Fig3_panelf.txt, column R2, tobacco leaves: A. thaliana; Methods Sec21
comparison panels
id: agront-2024-fig3f-panel-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana; title: PGB terminator strength tobacco leaves: A. thaliana: terminator strength prediction; protocol id: agront-2024-fig3f-task-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana; dataset id: agront-2024-fig3f-dataset-terminator-strength-test-sequences-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana; metric: r2; unit: coefficient of determination; direction: higher; result ids: agront-2024-fig3f-result-agront-terminator-strength-tobacco-leaves-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana-r2; agront-2024-fig3f-result-cnn-gorjifard-et-al-terminator-strength-tobacco-leaves-tobacco-leaves-a-thaliana-r2; source ids: agront-2024-fig3f-source; source locator: Fig3_panelf.txt, column R2, tobacco leaves: A. thaliana; Methods Sec21; context: Every method PGB terminator strength reports on terminator strength prediction, scored with R² on terminator strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana.; caveats: Author-reported R² values, source checked but not independently reproduced. No uncertainty is supplied in these tables.; Compare only within the same task, assay system and sequence class. No aggregate across these conditions is reported here.; Exact fitted checkpoint hashes, seeds and scoring denominators have not been established for these source rows.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-23
entity level
protocol
Related records

Suggest a correction