rewire.it
benchmark · task

Cell-type annotation

This paper-specific evaluation tests Cell-type annotation using hPancreas.

2 evaluations · 2 metric rows

At a glance

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. This does not change the review status of its results.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
Record typePaper-specific task; protocol incompletely extractedscELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column; Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column
InputshPancreasscELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column; Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column
AssessmentF1scELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column; Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column
Recorded split or evaluation settingUnextractedscELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column; Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column
DatasetsNot extracted or verified for this record.
OrganismsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AssaysNot extracted or verified for this record.
AdaptationNot extracted or verified for this record.
BaselinesNot extracted or verified for this record.

How it works

Reported evaluation outline

Outline of the existing paper extraction. Split membership, fitting details and scorer implementation remain incompletely reviewed.

Reported evaluation outlinehPancreas. Then: Recorded fitting or scoring procedure. Then: Assess F1hPancreasRecorded fitting or scoringprocedureAssess F1
Read the diagram as text
  1. hPancreas
  2. Recorded fitting or scoring procedure
  3. Assess F1
scELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column; Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column

Evaluation context

The existing paper extraction describes: Zero-shot setting; source caption says some comparator rows come from GenePT. This description is retained with the exact evaluation records; it is not a new protocol reconstruction.

scELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column; Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column

Tested models and results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
scGPT: Cell-type annotation

Zero-shot setting; source caption says some comparator rows come from GenePT.

Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.550 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedscELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / scGPT (z) row, F1 column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Geneformer: Cell-type annotation

Zero-shot setting; source caption says some comparator rows come from GenePT.

Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.270 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedscELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis · Table 1, hPancreas zero-shot / Geneformer (z) row, F1 column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Strengths and limitations

Limitations and conditions

Profile review details

Catalogue extraction inspected; protocol claims remain limited to the cited evidence. Missing details are not presumed absent from the original paper.

Stable record: reported-task-660753ec94e631

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-660753ec94e631

areas
cells-tissues
tasks
Cell-type annotation
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
Cell-type annotation
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
Related records

Suggest a correction