This paper-specific evaluation tests Multi-species prokaryotic promoter detection using 23 independent prokaryotic promoter test sets.
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. This does not change the review status of its results.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Record type | Paper-specific task; protocol incompletely extractediPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, iPro-MP row, AUC column; Table 2, Prompt row, AUC column |
| Inputs | 23 independent prokaryotic promoter test setsiPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, iPro-MP row, AUC column; Table 2, Prompt row, AUC column |
| Assessment | Mean AUCiPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, iPro-MP row, AUC column; Table 2, Prompt row, AUC column |
| Recorded split or evaluation setting | independent testiPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, iPro-MP row, AUC column; Table 2, Prompt row, AUC column |
| Datasets | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Organisms | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Assays | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Adaptation | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Baselines | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Outline of the existing paper extraction. Split membership, fitting details and scorer implementation remain incompletely reviewed.
The existing paper extraction describes: Average over independent testing sets.; Average over the same independent testing sets. This description is retained with the exact evaluation records; it is not a new protocol reconstruction.
iPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, iPro-MP row, AUC column; Table 2, Prompt row, AUC columnRelease 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| iPro-MP: Multi-species prokaryotic promoter detection Model: iPro-MP · Benchmark: Multi-species prokaryotic promoter detection · Dataset: 23 independent prokaryotic promoter test sets Average over independent testing sets. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.935 Mean AUC Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkediPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, iPro-MP row, AUC column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| Prompt: Multi-species prokaryotic promoter detection Model: Prompt · Benchmark: Multi-species prokaryotic promoter detection · Dataset: 23 independent prokaryotic promoter test sets Average over the same independent testing sets. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.835 Mean AUC Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkediPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters · Table 2, Prompt row, AUC column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Catalogue extraction inspected; protocol claims remain limited to the cited evidence. Missing details are not presumed absent from the original paper.
Stable record: reported-task-a1151e386a3d3fRelease 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-a1151e386a3d3f