rewire.it
Dataset

Rfam12.3–14.10

Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 10 evaluations · 40 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
MXfold2: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.632 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.664 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.670 INF

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.720 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

CONTRAfold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.702 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.667 INF

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.660 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

SPOT-RNA: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.678 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.672 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

EternaFold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.672 INF

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.664 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

RNAfold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.729 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.649 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

RNAstructure: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.643 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.651 INF

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.724 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

BPfold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.741 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.660 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

ContextFold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.595 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.648 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.612 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

LinearFold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.669 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 5: Rfam12.3–14.10 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.677 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 4: Rfam12.3–14.10 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

SimFold: Rfam12.3–14.10

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.646 INF

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.639 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDeep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy · Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 3: Rfam12.3–14.10 F1

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

7 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.reported_population.count

10791

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.reported_population.count

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.reported_population.unit

RNA sequences

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.reported_population.unit

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.split

Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.subset

No value recorded

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.subset

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

description

Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

name

Rfam12.3–14.10

Context-only references
Deep generalizable prediction of RNA secondary structure via base pair motif energy

Original source ↗

Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.502000+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 976218bd172998a1a6e7ed1609ecb8cb2ee380fb48a8dc7b25bc05ea8b0a49af

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-dataset-816ebb930725137655

areas
rna-transcriptomes
tasks
RNA secondary structure
split
Family-wise RNA secondary-structure evaluation; macro-average canonical base-pair metrics.
subset
Not reported
reported population
count: 10791; unit: RNA sequences
source locator
Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF
missing metadata
manifest: unextracted; scored count: unreported
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This record identifies a biological data collection or source-labelled evaluation cohort. Keep its dataset identity; split, assay, taxonomic level, candidate restrictions and comparison context remain attributes rather than automatically becoming new entity kinds.; source ids: bpfold-2025; source locator: Family-wise evaluation of three DL methods (BPfold, SPOT-RNA, and MXfold2), three shallow learning methods (ContextFold, CONTRAfold, and EternaFold) and non-learning methods (LinearFold, RNAfold, SimFold, and RNAstructure) on Rfam12.3–14.10 ( n  = 10,791 RNAs) and PDB ( n  = 116 RNAs) datasets; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 BPfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 SPOT-RNA, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 5 MXfold2, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 6 ContextFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 7 CONTRAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 8 EternaFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 9 LinearFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 10 RNAfold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 11 SimFold, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; Table 2 (Tab2), row 12 RNAstructure, column 2: Rfam12.3–14.10 INF; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction