rewire.it
Dataset subset

demo_human_or_worm (Genomic Benchmarks split)

The split of demo_human_or_worm that Genomic Benchmarks evaluated on. The upstream dataset release is not catalogued here, so no claim is made that this matches its original splits.

Subset and evaluation context

This record describes a particular subset or cohort used in an evaluation. Its results do not describe the full dataset.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 4 evaluations · 4 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Baseline CNN (PyTorch) on Genomic Benchmarks DEMO-HUMAN-OR-WORM-ACCURACY: demo_human_or_worm, Accuracy

The paper's own three-layer convolutional baseline, trained on each dataset's training split and scored on its test split. Architecture is in Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

93.0% accuracy

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGenomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification · Table 2, row(demo_human_or_worm), column(Baseline CNN (PyTorch) Accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Baseline CNN (PyTorch) on Genomic Benchmarks DEMO-HUMAN-OR-WORM-F1: demo_human_or_worm, F1 score

The paper's own three-layer convolutional baseline, trained on each dataset's training split and scored on its test split. Architecture is in Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

92.8% f1

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGenomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification · Table 2, row(demo_human_or_worm), column(Baseline CNN (PyTorch) F1 score)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Baseline CNN (TensorFlow) on Genomic Benchmarks DEMO-HUMAN-OR-WORM-ACCURACY: demo_human_or_worm, Accuracy

The paper's own three-layer convolutional baseline, trained on each dataset's training split and scored on its test split. Architecture is in Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

94.2% accuracy

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGenomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification · Table 2, row(demo_human_or_worm), column(Baseline CNN (TensorFlow) Accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Baseline CNN (TensorFlow) on Genomic Benchmarks DEMO-HUMAN-OR-WORM-F1: demo_human_or_worm, F1 score

The paper's own three-layer convolutional baseline, trained on each dataset's training split and scored on its test split. Architecture is in Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

93.2% f1

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGenomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification · Table 2, row(demo_human_or_worm), column(Baseline CNN (TensorFlow) F1 score)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
description

The split of demo_human_or_worm that Genomic Benchmarks evaluated on. The upstream dataset release is not catalogued here, so no claim is made that this matches its original splits.

Context-only references
Genomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Version: PMC10150520
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:07:13.681402+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: bda6fe51e3363a5d2fc8d265ca536897d3e83eb76458fc95066c21933e3bd0c0

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

name

demo_human_or_worm (Genomic Benchmarks split)

Context-only references
Genomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Version: PMC10150520
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:07:13.681402+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: bda6fe51e3363a5d2fc8d265ca536897d3e83eb76458fc95066c21933e3bd0c0

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: genomic-benchmarks-dataset-demo-human-or-worm

areas
dna-genomes
missing metadata
version: unreported; url: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction