rewire.it
evaluation · needs review

AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset: Zero-shot CAGI5 MPRA activity-effect prediction (borzoi-ensemble-matched comparison)

Compute locus/context Pearson correlations between predicted and observed effects. The Borzoi strategy uses its reported scoring windows and modified matching; the ChromBPNet comparison excludes the unavailable TERT-GBM context.

Evaluation procedure

Compute locus/context Pearson correlations between predicted and observed effects. The Borzoi strategy uses its reported scoring windows and modified matching; the ChromBPNet comparison excludes the unavailable TERT-GBM context.

Model
AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset
Benchmark
Zero-shot CAGI5 MPRA activity-effect prediction (borzoi-ensemble-matched comparison) (AlphaGenome paper)
Dataset
Zero-shot CAGI5 MPRA activity-effect prediction (borzoi-ensemble-matched comparison): evaluated data subset
origin
Author-reported evaluation
configuration
AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset
protocol id
alphagenome-2026-t4-protocol-9-row11
dataset version
Not reported
split
Use the challenge’s evaluation data and reported locus exclusions. Do not replace this locus-based protocol with the generic variant chromosome split.
population
CAGI5 challenge effects with hg19 sequence and GENCODEv19 annotations; comparator-specific locus/context sets.
inputs
Not reported
adaptation
AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset
metric implementation
Not reported
aggregation
Mean Pearson correlation over the included locus/context comparisons; Table4 rows10 and11 have different AlphaGenome scalars and must remain separate.
budget
Not reported

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-a757f4af4277 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset: Zero-shot CAGI5 MPRA activity-effect prediction (borzoi-ensemble-matched comparison)

Compute locus/context Pearson correlations between predicted and observed effects. The Borzoi strategy uses its reported scoring windows and modified matching; the ChromBPNet comparison excludes the unavailable TERT-GBM context.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.56 mean_pearsonr_all

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Aggregation: Mean Pearson correlation over the included locus/context comparisons; Table4 rows10 and11 have different AlphaGenome scalars and must remain separate.

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 4 Variant performan'!M11

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

63 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-a757f4af4277
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.comparison.adaptation

AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset

Context-only references
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.adaptation

AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset

Context-only references
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.adaptation

AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset

Context-only references
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.adaptation

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.aggregation

Mean Pearson correlation over the included locus/context comparisons; Table4 rows10 and11 have different AlphaGenome scalars and must remain separate.

Context-only references
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.aggregation

Mean Pearson correlation over the included locus/context comparisons; Table4 rows10 and11 have different AlphaGenome scalars and must remain separate.

Context-only references
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.aggregation

Mean Pearson correlation over the included locus/context comparisons; Table4 rows10 and11 have different AlphaGenome scalars and must remain separate.

Context-only references
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.aggregation

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.budget

No value recorded

Context-only references
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.budget

No value recorded

Context-only references
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.budget

No value recorded

Context-only references
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.budget

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

attributes.comparison.dataset_version

No value recorded

Context-only references
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.comparison.dataset_version

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-a757f4af4277 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: alphagenome-2026-evaluation-4f66864f98841ad8

areas
dna-genomes
origin
author_reported
protocol
Compute locus/context Pearson correlations between predicted and observed effects. The Borzoi strategy uses its reported scoring windows and modified matching; the ChromBPNet comparison excludes the unavailable TERT-GBM context.
version
AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset
source evaluation index
9
source table
4
comparison
protocol id: alphagenome-2026-t4-protocol-9-row11; dataset version: Not reported; split: Use the challenge’s evaluation data and reported locus exclusions. Do not replace this locus-based protocol with the generic variant chromosome split.; population: CAGI5 challenge effects with hg19 sequence and GENCODEv19 annotations; comparator-specific locus/context sets.; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: AlphaGenome distilled cell-type-matched DNase scorer, Borzoi-matched locus subset; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Mean Pearson correlation over the included locus/context comparisons; Table4 rows10 and11 have different AlphaGenome scalars and must remain separate.; budget: Not reported
context
allowed inputs: REF/ALT native genomic sequence and DNase scores averaged across cell-type-matched tracks; mappings differ by comparator strategy.; limitations: Native genomic prediction is compared with an MPRA measurement. Track proxies and context exclusions affect comparability; do not merge the two same-index rows into one evaluation population.
missing metadata
dataset version: unextracted; exact input manifest: unextracted; inference budget: unreported; scoring failures: unreported
Related records

Suggest a correction