rewire.it
evaluation · needs review

DiffDock: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses

Evaluation procedure

Potency prediction using DiffDock ligand-pose generation plus paper scoring pipeline; not a native DiffDock affinity score.

Model
DiffDock
Benchmark
Ligand potency prediction using generated poses
Dataset
SARS-CoV-2 Mpro ligands
origin
Independent external evaluation
configuration
Not reported
protocol id
Not reported
dataset version
Not reported
split
Not reported
population
Not reported
inputs
Not reported
adaptation
Not reported
metric implementation
Not reported
aggregation
Not reported
budget
Not reported

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
DiffDock: Ligand potency prediction using generated poses

Potency prediction using DiffDock ligand-pose generation plus paper scoring pipeline; not a native DiffDock affinity score.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.695 Pearson R

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: ± 0.037

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedA Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein–Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases · Table 3, DiffDock row, Pearson’s R column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-048

areas
molecular-interactions
tasks
Ligand potency prediction using generated poses
origin
independent_paper
protocol
Potency prediction using DiffDock ligand-pose generation plus paper scoring pipeline; not a native DiffDock affinity score.
version
Not reported
comparison
protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata
model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
Related records

Suggest a correction