evaluation · needs review

Stacking-Auto: enhancer prediction

Evaluation procedure

Two-stage Hi-Enhancer system; paper Table 2 method comparison

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
Stacking-Auto: enhancer prediction Model: Stacking-Auto · Benchmark: enhancer prediction · Dataset: enhancer independent comparison Two-stage Hi-Enhancer system; paper Table 2 method comparison Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
80.50% accuracy Unit: percent · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedHi-Enhancer: a two-stage framework for prediction and localization of enhancers based on Blending-KAN and Stacking-Auto models · Table 2, Ours (Stacking-Auto) row, Accuracy column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-b4-003

areas: dna-genomes
tasks: enhancer prediction
origin: author_reported
protocol: Two-stage Hi-Enhancer system; paper Table 2 method comparison
version: Not reported
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records