evaluation · needs review

PC-mer + LR: metagenomic genus classification

Evaluation procedure

k=8 PC-mer feature extraction with logistic regression on AMP genus-classification dataset

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
PC-mer + LR: metagenomic genus classification Model: PC-mer + LR · Benchmark: metagenomic genus classification · Dataset: AMP k=8 PC-mer feature extraction with logistic regression on AMP genus-classification dataset Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
96.95% accuracy Unit: percent · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedPC-mer: An Ultra-fast memory-efficient tool for metagenomics profiling and classification · Table 3, AMP section, PC-mer + LR k=8 row, Accuracy (%) column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-b4-019

areas: microbes-communities
tasks: metagenomic genus classification
origin: author_reported
protocol: k=8 PC-mer feature extraction with logistic regression on AMP genus-classification dataset
version: Not reported
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: genus-level; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records