Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
PHASTER as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 6 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| PHASTER: Genome-wide prophage detection Configuration: PHASTERProtocol: Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection)Dataset: LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.011 FPR Unit: fraction · Direction: lower | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column FPR; XML row4 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.764 Precision Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.786 MCC Unit: unitless · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column MCC; XML row4 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.989 Specificity Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Specificity; XML row4 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.855 Recall Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column Recall; XML row4 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.780 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PHASTER, column F1; XML row4 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-model-4b6b5df37bc0a8bbc9Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims | LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2 Version: PMC13041943.1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Introduction PHASTER as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims | LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models Table 5., row PHASTER, column Precision; XML row4 column2 Version: PMC13041943.1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: paper-model-4b6b5df37bc0a8bbc9