rewire.it
Pipeline

megaDNA†

megaDNA† as evaluated in the cited study. Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label

SourcesLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Precision; XML row12 column2

1 evaluation · 6 metric rows

At a glance

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 6 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
megaDNA†: Genome-wide prophage detection

Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.595 F1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column F1; XML row12 column6

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.671 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Recall; XML row12 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.012 FPR

Unit: fraction · Direction: lower

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column FPR; XML row12 column5

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.988 Specificity

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Specificity; XML row12 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.609 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column MCC; XML row12 column7

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.627 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Precision; XML row12 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label

SourcesLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Precision; XML row12 column2

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-model-235cc7b07d37f90c0c

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
ComponentsNot extracted or verified for this record.
InputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
OutputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AdaptationNot extracted or verified for this record.
ImplementationNot extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Evaluation in this paper

Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label

Individual claims
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models

Original source ↗

Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Precision; XML row12 column2

Version: PMC13041943.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.sections.0.body

Source artifact SHA-256: 22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Introduction

megaDNA† as evaluated in the cited study. Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label

Individual claims
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models

Original source ↗

Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Precision; XML row12 column2

Version: PMC13041943.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.summary

Source artifact SHA-256: 22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-model-235cc7b07d37f90c0c

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
Genome-wide prophage detection
entity level
method
configuration type
reported_configuration
version
Paper genome-scanning gLM pipeline, including filtered region postprocessing; exact encoder checkpoint not inferred from the label
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: Genome scanning with overlapping windows is followed by per-genome score normalization, smoothing, clustering/merging and size/score filtering to identify prophage regions. The reported row evaluates that complete workflow, not the unprocessed encoder. Preserve the exact source-scoped composition and its results; no additional checkpoint or family equivalence is inferred.; source ids: part2-lambda-prophage-2026; source locator: Table 5., row megaDNA†, column Precision; XML row12 column2 | Table 5 dagger-labelled genome-scanning rows; genome-wide detection Methods; Figure 2 caption; raw versus filtered region evaluation; ambiguities: This is the paper-specific pipeline identity. Missing component versions or checkpoint hashes remain unknown; a shared upstream name does not establish equivalent pipelines.
Related records

Suggest a correction