Model type
Protein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
This record tracks the ESM-2-feature configuration in a supervised clathrin-classification study.
Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.
Protein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
Protein amino-acid sequences
Clathrin versus non-clathrin classification
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier: clathrin protein classification Pipeline: ESM-2 embedding + paper classifierTask: clathrin protein classificationDataset: CLA-IND0.6 single-feature ESM-2 embedding comparison Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.916 accuracy Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 2, Independent test / ESM-2 row, ACC column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Pretrained protein embeddings are used as features for a downstream classifier. The paper also studies fused multi-model features and an LSTM; those combined PLM-CLA results must remain distinct from this ESM-2-only feature row.
ESM-2 is a transformer protein language-model family. The official repository exposes residue embeddings, sequence-level pooling and models at several sizes; the study configuration determines which of these is evaluated.
The linked evaluation record identifies ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier: clathrin protein classification. Its dataset, split, adaptation and evidence origin remain attached to the reported results.
Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.
Stable record: reported-model-e4710b1c3facf2Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Model type | Protein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md model description |
| Architecture / procedure | Pretrained protein embeddings are used as features for a downstream classifier. The paper also studies fused multi-model features and an LSTM; those combined PLM-CLA results must remain distinct from this ESM-2-only feature row.SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) |
| Biological inputs | Protein amino-acid sequencesSourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Introduction (paragraph 2); Conclusion (paragraph 1) |
| Outputs | Clathrin versus non-clathrin classificationSourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Results and discussions/Performance evaluation of individual feature embeddings (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) |
| Parameters | An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models; facebookresearch/esm README.md · Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision |
| Known versions / configuration | ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier is the comparison-table label; that label does not specify an immutable weight revision. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Model identification in the comparison table and corresponding Methods; immutable checkpoint revision is not supplied by the table label. |
| Training data / fitting | Le2019 and Zhang2020 clathrin datasets; Zhang2020 applies a 0.7 BLAST redundancy threshold and excludes sequences shorter than 220 residues.SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Dataset construction (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/Performance evaluation of PLM-CLA on other benchmark independent test datasets (paragraph 1) |
| Context limits | A maximum input/context length for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models; facebookresearch/esm README.md · Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for explicit maximum input length (dataset lengths and family-wide limits are not substituted); README.md at pinned repository revision |
| Access | Official upstream implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/facebookresearch/esm/blob/2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md; installation, model download and usage instructions |
| Code licence | MIT (upstream repository code at the cited revision; this does not establish every dependency or historical checkpoint licence).Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm LICENSE · LICENSE; complete licence text |
| Weights licence | The inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope |
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
22 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram caption Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings. Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram steps ["Protein amino-acid sequences","ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier","Clathrin versus non-clathrin classification"] Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram title Evaluated procedure (conceptual) Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Model type Protein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration. Individual claims | facebookresearch/esm README.md README.md model description Version: 2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Architecture / procedure Pretrained protein embeddings are used as features for a downstream classifier. The paper also studies fused multi-model features and an LSTM; those combined PLM-CLA results must remain distinct from this ESM-2-only feature row. Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Weights licence The inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately. Individual claims | facebookresearch/esm README.md README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope Version: 2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Biological inputs Protein amino-acid sequences Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Introduction (paragraph 2); Conclusion (paragraph 1) Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Outputs Clathrin versus non-clathrin classification Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Results and discussions/Performance evaluation of individual feature embeddings (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Parameters An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. Individual claims | Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: journal full text in PMC | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Parameters An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. Individual claims | facebookresearch/esm README.md Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsPrimary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-model-e4710b1c3facf2