rewire.it
Pipeline

ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier

This record tracks the ESM-2-feature configuration in a supervised clathrin-classification study.

SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Feature selection method (paragraph 1); Introduction (paragraph 3)

1 evaluation · 1 metric row

How it worksEvaluated procedure (conceptual)
Evaluated procedure (conceptual)1. Protein amino-acid sequences. Then: 2. ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier. Then: 3. Clathrin versus non-clathrin classificationEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. Protein amino-acid sequences. Then: 2. ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier. Then: 3. Clathrin versus non-clathrin classificationEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. Protein amino-acid sequences. Then: 2. ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier. Then: 3. Clathrin versus non-clathrin classification

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)

At a glance

Model type

Protein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.

Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md model description

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier: clathrin protein classification

single-feature ESM-2 embedding comparison

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.916 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 2, Independent test / ESM-2 row, ACC column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

How it works

How the evaluated method works

Pretrained protein embeddings are used as features for a downstream classifier. The paper also studies fused multi-model features and an LSTM; those combined PLM-CLA results must remain distinct from this ESM-2-only feature row.

SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)
Underlying method and version boundaries

ESM-2 is a transformer protein language-model family. The official repository exposes residue embeddings, sequence-level pooling and models at several sizes; the study configuration determines which of these is evaluated.

Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md; introduction, model description, pretrained-model and usage sections at pinned revision
What was evaluated

The linked evaluation record identifies ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier: clathrin protein classification. Its dataset, split, adaptation and evidence origin remain attached to the reported results.

SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · The named evaluation’s methods and comparison table; exact preserved evaluation IDs: evaluation-b2-clathrin-plm-2025

Strengths and limitations

Profile review details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Stable record: reported-model-e4710b1c3facf2

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeProtein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md model description
Architecture / procedurePretrained protein embeddings are used as features for a downstream classifier. The paper also studies fused multi-model features and an LSTM; those combined PLM-CLA results must remain distinct from this ESM-2-only feature row.
SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)
Biological inputsProtein amino-acid sequences
SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Introduction (paragraph 2); Conclusion (paragraph 1)
OutputsClathrin versus non-clathrin classification
SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Results and discussions/Performance evaluation of individual feature embeddings (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)
ParametersAn aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models; facebookresearch/esm README.md · Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision
Known versions / configurationESM-2 embedding + paper classifier is the comparison-table label; that label does not specify an immutable weight revision. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Model identification in the comparison table and corresponding Methods; immutable checkpoint revision is not supplied by the table label.
Training data / fittingLe2019 and Zhang2020 clathrin datasets; Zhang2020 applies a 0.7 BLAST redundancy threshold and excludes sequences shorter than 220 residues.
SourcesAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Materials and methods/Dataset construction (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/Performance evaluation of PLM-CLA on other benchmark independent test datasets (paragraph 1)
Context limitsA maximum input/context length for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models; facebookresearch/esm README.md · Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for explicit maximum input length (dataset lengths and family-wide limits are not substituted); README.md at pinned repository revision
AccessOfficial upstream implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/facebookresearch/esm/blob/2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.
Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md; installation, model download and usage instructions
Code licenceMIT (upstream repository code at the cited revision; this does not establish every dependency or historical checkpoint licence).
Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm LICENSE · LICENSE; complete licence text
Weights licenceThe inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sourcesfacebookresearch/esm README.md · README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

22 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Protein amino-acid sequences","ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier","Clathrin versus non-clathrin classification"]

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Evaluated procedure (conceptual)

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Model type

Protein sequence transformer; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.

Individual claims
facebookresearch/esm README.md

Original source ↗

README.md model description

Version: 2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:00:00.816433+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 8b273c21a322fc9473d1b68d0dd40c8166ab2f89e4a190aa26ca87251b97cba9

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Architecture / procedure

Pretrained protein embeddings are used as features for a downstream classifier. The paper also studies fused multi-model features and an LSTM; those combined PLM-CLA results must remain distinct from this ESM-2-only feature row.

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Weights licence

The inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately.

Individual claims
facebookresearch/esm README.md

Original source ↗

README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope

Version: 2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:00:00.816433+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 8b273c21a322fc9473d1b68d0dd40c8166ab2f89e4a190aa26ca87251b97cba9

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Biological inputs

Protein amino-acid sequences

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Introduction (paragraph 2); Conclusion (paragraph 1)

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Outputs

Clathrin versus non-clathrin classification

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Results and discussions/Performance evaluation of individual feature embeddings (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1)

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Parameters

An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources.

Individual claims
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558194+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Parameters

An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources.

Individual claims
facebookresearch/esm README.md

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Dataset construction; Materials and methods/Protein language model; Materials and methods/Feature selection method; Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA; Materials and methods/Performance evaluation; Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance; Results and discussions/Comparison of PLM-CLA with existing methods; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 2b369911bb5b4b0dda914521b9475cad1656b2ac
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:00:00.816433+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 8b273c21a322fc9473d1b68d0dd40c8166ab2f89e4a190aa26ca87251b97cba9

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

3 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-model-e4710b1c3facf2

areas
proteins-complexes
entity level
method
version
not stated in table
reported name
ESM-2 embedding + paper classifier
historical missing metadata
checkpoint revision: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; training data: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; licence: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This record identifies a composed analysis workflow with separately identifiable upstream models, representations or tools and a downstream prediction/scoring procedure. Results belong to that complete composition rather than to an upstream model alone.; source ids: clathrin-plm-2025; evidence-reported-base-esm-readme-md; source locator: Materials and methods/Overall framework of PLM-CLA (paragraph 1); Results and discussions/The effect of feature selection methods on the predictive performance (paragraph 1) | README.md model description | Materials and methods/Feature selection method (paragraph 1); Introduction (paragraph 3); ambiguities: This is the paper-specific pipeline identity; unspecified component checkpoints or implementation versions are not inferred from its name.
Related records

Suggest a correction