MIST CANOPUS retrieval Top 200: MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200

Overview

MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200. Scored with Retrieval accuracy@200 on MIST CANOPUS benchmark test set used in DreaMS Extended Data Table 1. MIST CANOPUS PubChem candidate retrieval; candidate positives share true molecule InChIKey first14 characters, negatives share molecular formula; rank cosine similarity of predicted and candidate fingerprints; accuracy@k is fraction of spectra with positive candidate in top k, printed as percent. Full test set named in Extended Data Table 1; exact split version/hash unextracted; 8000 spectra/7000 molecules describes total benchmark, not confirmed test denominator.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

Evaluation scope and datasetMetric and reported setup

MIST CANOPUS retrieval Top 200: MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200

accuracy_at_200 (percent) · Higher values are better.

Every method MIST CANOPUS retrieval reports on MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200, scored with Retrieval accuracy@200 on MIST CANOPUS benchmark test set used in DreaMS Extended Data Table 1.

MIST CANOPUS retrieval Top 200: MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200 · MIST CANOPUS benchmark test set used in DreaMS Extended Data Table 1 (MIST CANOPUS retrieval split)

Evidence origin: Evaluation origin not reported, Author-reported evaluation. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

dreams: Journal full-text XML · Extended Data Table 1 (XML Tab1), Top 200 column; Methods / Molecular fingerprint prediction

DreaMS uses raw spectra; MIST uses peak formula annotations. Do not portray as matched-input or zero-shot comparison.

All comparison limitations (5)

DreaMS uses raw spectra; MIST uses peak formula annotations. Do not portray as matched-input or zero-shot comparison.
Unreported in the inspected table/methods; 8000 spectra/7000 molecules describes total benchmark, not confirmed test denominator.
Comparator cells are reported in the DreaMS article; original upstream result identities/execution provenance require resolution before claiming independent evidence.
No intervals or standard errors are printed. Dashes are unreported and not zero.
Table includes three contrastive training methods using extra PubChem candidates; this is an author-reported comparison, not a matched-input leaderboard.

Automated source review: 2026-09-23.

Find a tested model or method

No unavailable values; missing scores remain labelled and are never plotted as zero.

Showing 6 of 6 matching rows.

Zoom to observed range

Tested configuration

0255075100

Reported score

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

MIST CANOPUS molecular retrieval

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations: 1
unreported: 5

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Relationship: part of dreams-2025-mist-canopus-retrieval Individual claims	dreams: Journal full-text XML Original source ↗ Extended Data Table 1 (XML Tab1), Top 200 column; Methods / Molecular fingerprint prediction Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.200000+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit details Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction. Field: `links:part_of:dreams-2025-mist-canopus-retrieval` Claim: dreams-mist-retrieval-association-top-200 Source artifact SHA-256: `4bbe2ecff0ad75944b3aec5131369c1b2f75ff6f4b5dc257487a274fdd7b0fef` Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes Format: original_artifact Inspected artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release history

dreams: Journal full-text XML · Original source · Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dreams-mist-retrieval-task-top-200

areas: metabolomics
tasks: MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200
metric: Retrieval accuracy@200
metric direction: higher
dataset: MIST CANOPUS benchmark test set used in DreaMS Extended Data Table 1
protocol: MIST CANOPUS PubChem candidate retrieval; candidate positives share true molecule InChIKey first14 characters, negatives share molecular formula; rank cosine similarity of predicted and candidate fingerprints; accuracy@k is fraction of spectra with positive candidate in top k, printed as percent. Full test set named in Extended Data Table 1; exact split version/hash unextracted; 8000 spectra/7000 molecules describes total benchmark, not confirmed test denominator.
source locator: Extended Data Table 1 (XML Tab1), Top 200 column; Methods / Molecular fingerprint prediction
comparison panels: id: dreams-mist-retrieval-panel-top-200; title: MIST CANOPUS retrieval Top 200: MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200; protocol id: dreams-mist-retrieval-task-top-200; dataset id: dreams-mist-retrieval-dataset-mist-canopus-benchmark-test-set-used-in-dreams-extended-data-table-1; metric: accuracy_at_200; unit: percent; direction: higher; result ids: dreams-mist-retrieval-result-ffn-fingerprint-top-200-accuracy-at-200; dreams-mist-retrieval-result-ffn-contrastive-top-200-accuracy-at-200; dreams-mist-retrieval-result-mist-fingerprint-top-200-accuracy-at-200; dreams-mist-retrieval-result-mist-contrastive-top-200-accuracy-at-200; dreams-mist-retrieval-result-mist-contrastive-plus-fingerprint-top-200-accuracy-at-200; dreams-mist-retrieval-result-dreams-fingerprint-ours-top-200-accuracy-at-200; source ids: evidence-official-116050b81d03a38e3b6f; source locator: Extended Data Table 1 (XML Tab1), Top 200 column; Methods / Molecular fingerprint prediction; context: Every method MIST CANOPUS retrieval reports on MIST CANOPUS fingerprint retrieval: Top 200, scored with Retrieval accuracy@200 on MIST CANOPUS benchmark test set used in DreaMS Extended Data Table 1.; caveats: DreaMS uses raw spectra; MIST uses peak formula annotations. Do not portray as matched-input or zero-shot comparison.; Unreported in the inspected table/methods; 8000 spectra/7000 molecules describes total benchmark, not confirmed test denominator.; Comparator cells are reported in the DreaMS article; original upstream result identities/execution provenance require resolution before claiming independent evidence.; No intervals or standard errors are printed. Dashes are unreported and not zero.; Table includes three contrastive training methods using extra PubChem candidates; this is an author-reported comparison, not a matched-input leaderboard.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-23
entity level: protocol

Related records