rewire.it
Protocol

mRNABench variant probes eCLIP: eCLIP binding site prediction

eCLIP binding site prediction. Scored with AUPRC on mRNABench eCLIP (mRNABench split). Frozen transcript representations with task-specific linear probes, or named supervised/naive controls. Homology splits where possible; random splits for MRL-MPRA, MRL-HL-Pair and VEP. Reported mean over ten splits; Appendix C enumerates nine seeds. Table captions say ten random splits, while Methods specify homology splits where possible. This source ambiguity and the nine explicitly listed seeds are retained; exact split manifests remain unextracted. Appendix C uses micro-averaged multilabel metrics.

50 evaluations · 50 metric rows

Overview

eCLIP binding site prediction. Scored with AUPRC on mRNABench eCLIP (mRNABench split). Frozen transcript representations with task-specific linear probes, or named supervised/naive controls. Homology splits where possible; random splits for MRL-MPRA, MRL-HL-Pair and VEP. Reported mean over ten splits; Appendix C enumerates nine seeds. Table captions say ten random splits, while Methods specify homology splits where possible. This source ambiguity and the nine explicitly listed seeds are retained; exact split manifests remain unextracted. Appendix C uses micro-averaged multilabel metrics.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

mRNABench variant probes eCLIP: eCLIP binding site prediction

auprc (fraction) · Higher values are better.

Every method mRNABench variant probes reports on eCLIP binding site prediction, scored with AUPRC on mRNABench eCLIP (mRNABench split).

mRNABench variant probes eCLIP: eCLIP binding site prediction · mRNABench eCLIP (mRNABench split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

mRNABench: A curated benchmark for mature mRNA property and function prediction · Table 5 (XML T2), eCLIP column; Methods S17/S18; Appendix C (APP3)

These are configuration-level details of the experiment set summarized by the paper’s Table 2; they are not new independent experiments.

All comparison limitations (5)
  • These are configuration-level details of the experiment set summarized by the paper’s Table 2; they are not new independent experiments.
  • Tables report means over ten splits and 95% confidence intervals. Appendix C lists only nine seeds; the missing seed is not inferred.
  • Two localization columns are excluded because Table 2 and Table 5 disagree about their metric.
  • Supervised CNN and naive feature controls are retained; not every method is a pretrained model.
  • Table captions say ten random splits, while Methods specify homology splits where possible. This source ambiguity and the nine explicitly listed seeds are retained; exact split manifests remain unextracted.

Automated source review: 2026-09-23.

No unavailable values; missing scores remain labelled and are never plotted as zero.

Showing 12 of 50 matching rows.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
50

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Training-set mean where supervised fitting is permitted

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Simple features with train-only ridge regression

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-mrnabench
Individual claims
mRNABench: A curated benchmark for mature mRNA property and function prediction

Original source ↗

Table 5 (XML T2), eCLIP column; Methods S17/S18; Appendix C (APP3)

Version: preprint archived 2025-07-08
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.497221+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-23

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-mrnabench

Claim: mrnabench-variants-2025-association-eclip

Source artifact SHA-256: 79f6264ee883535203c63a313547e7c57baa85585f76b42f8d899eb17fb7e600

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: mrnabench-variants-2025-task-eclip

areas
rna-transcriptomics
tasks
eCLIP binding site prediction
metric
AUPRC
metric direction
higher
dataset
mRNABench eCLIP (mRNABench split)
protocol
Frozen transcript representations with task-specific linear probes, or named supervised/naive controls. Homology splits where possible; random splits for MRL-MPRA, MRL-HL-Pair and VEP. Reported mean over ten splits; Appendix C enumerates nine seeds. Table captions say ten random splits, while Methods specify homology splits where possible. This source ambiguity and the nine explicitly listed seeds are retained; exact split manifests remain unextracted. Appendix C uses micro-averaged multilabel metrics.
source locator
Table 5 (XML T2), eCLIP column; Methods S17/S18; Appendix C (APP3)
comparison panels
id: mrnabench-variants-2025-panel-eclip; title: mRNABench variant probes eCLIP: eCLIP binding site prediction; protocol id: mrnabench-variants-2025-task-eclip; dataset id: mrnabench-dataset-mrnabench-eclip; metric: auprc; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: mrnabench-variants-2025-result-aido-rna-1b600m-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-aido-rna-1b600m-cds-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-aido-rna-650m-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-aido-rna-650m-cds-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-dnabert-s-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-dnabert2-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-ernierna-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-ernierna-ss-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-evo-1-131k-base-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-evo-1-8k-base-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-evo-1-5-8k-base-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-evo2-1b-base-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-evo2-7b-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-evo2-7b-base-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-helix-mrna-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-hyenadna-large-1m-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-hyenadna-medium-160k-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-hyenadna-medium-450k-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-hyenadna-small-32k-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-hyenadna-tiny-16k-d128-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-mrna-fm-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-naive-4-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-naive-6-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-naive-mamba-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-2-5b-1000g-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-2-5b-multi-species-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-500m-1000g-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-500m-human-ref-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-v2-100m-multi-species-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-v2-250m-multi-species-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-v2-500m-multi-species-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-nt-v2-50m-multi-species-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-orthrus-base-4-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-orthrus-large-6-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-orthrus-mlm-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-rinalmo-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-rna-fm-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-rnabert-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-rnaernie-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-rnamsm-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-splicebert-h-510nt-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-splicebert-v-1024nt-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-splicebert-v-510nt-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-supervised-cnn-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-utrbert-3mer-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-utrbert-4mer-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-utrbert-5mer-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-utrbert-6mer-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-utrlm-mrl-eclip-auprc; mrnabench-variants-2025-result-utrlm-te-el-eclip-auprc; source ids: expansion-p3-mrnabench-2025; source locator: Table 5 (XML T2), eCLIP column; Methods S17/S18; Appendix C (APP3); context: Every method mRNABench variant probes reports on eCLIP binding site prediction, scored with AUPRC on mRNABench eCLIP (mRNABench split).; caveats: These are configuration-level details of the experiment set summarized by the paper’s Table 2; they are not new independent experiments.; Tables report means over ten splits and 95% confidence intervals. Appendix C lists only nine seeds; the missing seed is not inferred.; Two localization columns are excluded because Table 2 and Table 5 disagree about their metric.; Supervised CNN and naive feature controls are retained; not every method is a pretrained model.; Table captions say ten random splits, while Methods specify homology splits where possible. This source ambiguity and the nine explicitly listed seeds are retained; exact split manifests remain unextracted.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-23
entity level
protocol
Related records

Suggest a correction