0.22286860581745235 accuracy
Majority Vote · Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY · Accuracy
- Tested configuration
- Majority Vote
- Task
- Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy
- Dataset subset
- Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
- Procedure
- All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).
- Evaluation
- Majority Vote on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy
- Evidence
- Author-reported evaluation · source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(majority_vote), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)
A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.
Methods and reproduction
Open Problems label projection evaluation of Majority Vote on Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy, scored with Accuracy.
- task
- Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy
- configuration
- Majority Vote
- dataset subset
- Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
- Split
- Not reported
- Adaptation
- Not reported
- Scoring implementation
- Accuracy
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Majority Vote on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy Configuration: Majority VoteTask: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), AccuracyDataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type). Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked | ||
| 0.22286860581745235 accuracy Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: Not reported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(majority_vote), paramset(none), metric(accuracy) Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Reported result 0.22286860581745235 Individual claims | openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(majority_vote), paramset(none), metric(accuracy) Version: v1.0.0 | source checked Deterministic parse of the run records embedded in the pinned page, with the direction of each metric taken from the page's own maximize flag · 2026-09-18 author reported Audit detailsSource checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Extraction artifact SHA-256: |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
Download this releaseTechnical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: open-problems-result-majority-vote-tabula-muris-senis-lung-random-accuracy-accuracy
- areas
- cells-tissues
- tasks
- Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy
- metric
- accuracy
- metric direction
- higher
- unit
- fraction
- printed value
- 0.22286860581745235
- numeric value
- 0.22286860581745235
- uncertainty
- Not reported
- source locator
- results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(majority_vote), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)
- missing metadata
- denominator: unextracted; seeds: unreported
- review
- method: Deterministic parse of the run records embedded in the pinned page, with the direction of each metric taken from the page's own maximize flag; reviewer: Codex research agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-09-18; artifact sha256: e223ab712ff55997a3abe659f280d4ea2952700e767b87e02c434701da9833c1; retrieval url: https://www.openproblems.bio/benchmarks/label_projection/v1.0.0/; notes: Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.