0.6814826306177239 f1-macro
XGBoost (log CP10k) · Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO · Macro F1 score
- Tested configuration
- XGBoost (log CP10k)
- Task
- Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score
- Dataset subset
- Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
- Procedure
- 90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).
- Evaluation
- XGBoost (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score
- Evidence
- Author-reported evaluation · source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro)
A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.
Methods and reproduction
Open Problems label projection evaluation of XGBoost (log CP10k) on Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score, scored with Macro F1 score.
- task
- Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score
- configuration
- XGBoost (log CP10k)
- dataset subset
- Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
- Split
- Not reported
- Adaptation
- Not reported
- Scoring implementation
- Macro F1 score
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| XGBoost (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score Configuration: XGBoost (log CP10k)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 scoreDataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) 90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked | ||
| 0.6814826306177239 f1-macro Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: Not reported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Reported result 0.6814826306177239 Individual claims | openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) Version: v1.0.0 | source checked Deterministic parse of the run records embedded in the pinned page, with the direction of each metric taken from the page's own maximize flag · 2026-09-18 author reported Audit detailsSource checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Extraction artifact SHA-256: |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
Download this releaseTechnical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: open-problems-result-xgboost-log-cp10k-zebrafish-random-f1-macro-f1-macro
- areas
- cells-tissues
- tasks
- Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score
- metric
- f1-macro
- metric direction
- higher
- unit
- fraction
- printed value
- 0.6814826306177239
- numeric value
- 0.6814826306177239
- uncertainty
- Not reported
- source locator
- results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro)
- missing metadata
- denominator: unextracted; seeds: unreported
- review
- method: Deterministic parse of the run records embedded in the pinned page, with the direction of each metric taken from the page's own maximize flag; reviewer: Codex research agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-09-18; artifact sha256: e223ab712ff55997a3abe659f280d4ea2952700e767b87e02c434701da9833c1; retrieval url: https://www.openproblems.bio/benchmarks/label_projection/v1.0.0/; notes: Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.