rewire.it
Result

0.723 Recall

GENERanno†: Recall on Genome-wide prophage detection

Tested pipeline
GENERanno†
Protocol
Genome-wide prophage detection (Genome-wide prophage detection)
Dataset
LAMBDA genome-wide prophage test
Procedure
Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations.
Evaluation
GENERanno†: Genome-wide prophage detection
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row GENERanno†, column Recall; XML row11 column3

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
GENERanno†: Genome-wide prophage detection

Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.723 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row GENERanno†, column Recall; XML row11 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result

0.723

Individual claims
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models

Original source ↗

Table 5., row GENERanno†, column Recall; XML row11 column3

Version: PMC13041943.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00

source checked

Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review · 2026-09-17

author reported

Audit details

Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: source checked

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-result-497e6cae9ab0ad3020

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
Genome-wide prophage detection
printed value
0.723
numeric value
0.723
metric
Recall
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
uncertainty
Not reported
eligible count
Not reported
scored count
Not reported
reported population
Not reported
source locator
Table 5., row GENERanno†, column Recall; XML row11 column3
source occurrences
source id: part2-lambda-prophage-2026; locator: Table 5., row GENERanno†, column Recall; XML row11 column3
review
method: Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review; date: 2026-09-17; note: Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.
missing metadata
scored count: unreported; eligible count: unextracted; checkpoint revision: unextracted; uncertainty: unreported
Related records

Suggest a correction