rewire.it
Result

0.50 Accuracy

IBPP: Accuracy on E. coli sigma70 independent promoter test

Tested configuration
IBPP
Protocol
E. coli sigma70 independent promoter test (E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction)
Dataset
E. coli sigma70 promoter dataset
Procedure
Test-only evaluation on Cassiano and Silva-Rocha 2020 data; methods have different training histories. 865 high-evidence RegulonDB 10.5 promoters and 1,000 nucleotide-distribution-matched negative sequences. Promoter exact matches removed from model training.
Evaluation
IBPP: E. coli sigma70 independent promoter test
Evidence
Result quoted from another source · source checkedProkBERT family: genomic language models for microbiome applications · Table 3, row IBPP, column Accuracy; XML row12 column2

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
IBPP: E. coli sigma70 independent promoter test

Test-only evaluation on Cassiano and Silva-Rocha 2020 data; methods have different training histories. 865 high-evidence RegulonDB 10.5 promoters and 1,000 nucleotide-distribution-matched negative sequences. Promoter exact matches removed from model training.

Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.50 Accuracy

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProkBERT family: genomic language models for microbiome applications · Table 3, row IBPP, column Accuracy; XML row12 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result

0.50

Individual claims
ProkBERT family: genomic language models for microbiome applications

Original source ↗

Table 3, row IBPP, column Accuracy; XML row12 column2

Version: PMC10810988.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:14.890826+00:00

source checked

Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review · 2026-09-17

paper compilation

Audit details

Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 8610e2a54aa877c8dc565a9cdb6e82099f284c5e0907a52cab18d994ea732436

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: source checked

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-result-68a650408dc07175aa

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction
printed value
0.50
numeric value
0.50
metric
Accuracy
metric direction
higher
unit
unitless
uncertainty
Not reported
eligible count
Not reported
scored count
Not reported
reported population
Not reported
source locator
Table 3, row IBPP, column Accuracy; XML row12 column2
source occurrences
source id: part2-prokbert-2024; locator: Table 3, row IBPP, column Accuracy; XML row12 column2
review
method: Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review; date: 2026-09-17; note: Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.
missing metadata
scored count: unreported; eligible count: unextracted; checkpoint revision: unextracted; uncertainty: unreported
Related records

Suggest a correction