rewire.it
Task

BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

Chromatin accessibility. Scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility. A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

15 evaluations · 15 metric rows

Overview

Chromatin accessibility. Scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility. A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Published comparisons

Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies. The pooled view gathers every source table that reports the same metric and names what it does not hold constant.

BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

auroc (fraction) · Higher values are better for this metric.

Every method BEND reports on Chromatin accessibility, scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility.

Evaluation protocol · ENCODE chromatin accessibility (BEND split)

  1. BASSET · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.85
  2. CNN · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.75
  3. ResNet-LM · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.82
  4. AWD-LSTM · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.69
  5. NT-H · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.74
  6. NT-MS · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.79
  7. NT-1000G · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.77
  8. NT-V2 · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.80
  9. DNABERT · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.85
  10. DNABERT-2 · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.81
  11. GENA-LM BERT · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.76
  12. GENA-LM BigBird · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.82
  13. HyenaDNA large · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.84
  14. HyenaDNA tiny · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.78
  15. GROVER · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.82

Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 1, row(Chromatin accessibility)
Values, uncertainty and evidence
auroc: original source values
Tested entityPrinted valueUncertaintyEvidence
BASSET · Configuration0.85 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(Expert method), column(Chromatin accessibility)
CNN · Method0.75 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(CNN), column(Chromatin accessibility)
ResNet-LM · Method0.82 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(ResNet-LM), column(Chromatin accessibility)
AWD-LSTM · Method0.69 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(AWD-LSTM), column(Chromatin accessibility)
NT-H · Method0.74 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-H), column(Chromatin accessibility)
NT-MS · Method0.79 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-MS), column(Chromatin accessibility)
NT-1000G · Configuration0.77 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-1000G), column(Chromatin accessibility)
NT-V2 · Configuration0.80 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-V2), column(Chromatin accessibility)
DNABERT · Configuration0.85 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(DNABERT), column(Chromatin accessibility)
DNABERT-2 · Configuration0.81 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(DNABERT-2), column(Chromatin accessibility)
GENA-LM BERT · Configuration0.76 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(GENA-LM BERT), column(Chromatin accessibility)
GENA-LM BigBird · Configuration0.82 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(GENA-LM BigBird), column(Chromatin accessibility)
HyenaDNA large · Configuration0.84 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(HyenaDNA large), column(Chromatin accessibility)
HyenaDNA tiny · Configuration0.78 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(HyenaDNA tiny), column(Chromatin accessibility)
GROVER · Configuration0.82 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(GROVER), column(Chromatin accessibility)
Scope and limitations
  • Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.
  • The expert entries are specialist published models, each compared on one task only.
  • The metric differs by task, taken from Table 1, so these figures cannot be averaged into one score.

Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-18. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 15 evaluations · 15 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
AWD-LSTM on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.69 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(AWD-LSTM), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

BASSET on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.85 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(Expert method), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

CNN on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.75 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(CNN), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DNABERT-2 on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.81 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(DNABERT-2), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DNABERT on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.85 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(DNABERT), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENA-LM BERT on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.76 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(GENA-LM BERT), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENA-LM BigBird on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.82 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(GENA-LM BigBird), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GROVER on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.82 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(GROVER), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

HyenaDNA large on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.84 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(HyenaDNA large), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

HyenaDNA tiny on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.78 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(HyenaDNA tiny), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

NT-1000G on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.77 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-1000G), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

NT-H on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.74 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-H), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

NT-MS on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.79 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-MS), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

NT-V2 on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.80 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-V2), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

ResNet-LM on BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility

A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.82 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(ResNet-LM), column(Chromatin accessibility)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of

discovery-benchmark-bend

Individual claims
BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks

Original source ↗

Table 1, row(Chromatin accessibility)

Version: Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T08:06:28.183228+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-18

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-bend

Claim: bend-association-chromatin

Source artifact SHA-256: f709b6bef3120eb979c0a0e02d2582475c49410f29850ed7601ba7a700ca379d

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: bend-task-chromatin

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
Chromatin accessibility
metric
AUROC
metric direction
higher
dataset
ENCODE chromatin accessibility
protocol
A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.
source locator
Table 1, row(Chromatin accessibility)
comparison panels
id: bend-panel-chromatin; title: BEND CHROMATIN: Chromatin accessibility; protocol id: bend-task-chromatin; dataset id: bend-dataset-encode-chromatin-accessibility; metric: auroc; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: bend-result-basset-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-cnn-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-resnet-lm-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-awd-lstm-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-nt-h-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-nt-ms-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-nt-1000g-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-nt-v2-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-dnabert-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-dnabert-2-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-gena-lm-bert-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-gena-lm-bigbird-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-hyenadna-large-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-hyenadna-tiny-chromatin-auroc; bend-result-grover-chromatin-auroc; source ids: evidence-expansion-bend-final-f709b6be; source locator: Table 1, row(Chromatin accessibility); context: Every method BEND reports on Chromatin accessibility, scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility.; caveats: Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.; The expert entries are specialist published models, each compared on one task only.; The metric differs by task, taken from Table 1, so these figures cannot be averaged into one score.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-18
Related records

Suggest a correction