rewire.it
Task

Batch integration

Batch integration asks whether measurements from different experiments can be combined while preserving biological differences.

Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

0 evaluations · 0 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: source reviewed · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
Entity typeTask guide; concrete protocol identities remain separate.
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
DatasetsNo single dataset is fixed by this guide. Select a linked protocol and its versioned data release. · Not applicable
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
OrganismsNo shared organism population is defined at this guide level. Record it for each selected dataset. · Not applicable
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
AssaysNo single measurement assay is fixed by this guide; the endpoint and assay belong to the selected protocol. · Not applicable
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
SplitsNo executable split is attached to this task identity. Use the selected protocol’s split manifest. · Not applicable
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
Allowed inputsSingle-cell measurements with batch labels and biological annotations; the chosen method may return a corrected matrix, embedding or graph.
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
AdaptationNo common fitting regime is imposed here. Keep pretrained, frozen, probed, fine-tuned and conventional methods distinct where applicable. · Not applicable
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
MetricsscIB includes cell-type silhouette, ARI/NMI and trajectory conservation for biology; batch silhouette, iLISI, kBET and graph connectivity for batch effects.
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
BaselinesDocumented integration comparators include Harmony, MNN, scVI and Seurat. Versions and preprocessing are part of the configuration.
Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

How it works

How it worksConceptual evaluation workflow
Conceptual evaluation workflow1. Select annotated datasets and protocol. Then: 2. Apply the integration method. Then: 3. Measure retained biological variation. Then: 4. Measure residual batch effectsConceptual evaluation workflow1. Select annotated datasets and protocol. Then: 2. Apply the integration method. Then: 3. Measure retained biological variation. Then: 4. Measure residual batch effectsConceptual evaluation workflow1. Select annotated datasets and protocol. Then: 2. Apply the integration method. Then: 3. Measure retained biological variation. Then: 4. Measure residual batch effects

Conceptual task guide. Dataset preparation, parameters and scoring must come from a separately identified protocol.

Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
Choosing an evaluation

Assess two objectives separately: removal of technical batch effects and retention of cell identities and biological variation. scIB supplies metrics for both. A model that mixes every cell together can score well on mixing while destroying useful biology, so one objective cannot substitute for the other. Use a concrete scIB or Open Problems protocol for datasets, preprocessing and scoring; those resources are not interchangeable.

Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
Task scope

This is a task guide, not a single versioned benchmark protocol. The connected resources provide examples or concrete procedures. A candidate method or proposed control is not evidence that an evaluation has been completed.

Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 0 evaluations · 0 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

No evaluations linked in this release.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-source discovery and table/protocol screening; source checked is not independently reproduced. Raw acquisitions not automatically numerical publication approval.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomicsPMC8748196Read source
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8

What is still missing

  • Bio-conservation and batch-removal components depend on datasets and preprocessing. Figures do not justify new exact numerical scores; official source-data matrix extraction remains pending. Broad batch integration is not identical to scIB or Open Problems.
Search and extraction details

broad task requires concrete protocol links

Searches

  • Batch integration primary paper benchmark results

Evidence locations

  • Table1 tasks and integration-evaluation methods; result figures

Strengths and limitations

Strengths supported by sources

  • A two-part assessment can expose overcorrection that a batch-mixing score alone misses.
    Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Limitations and conditions

  • Metric choice depends on available labels and output representation. This guide supplies neither a shared cohort nor a universal combined score.
    Sourcestheislab/scib official source · README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools
Profile review details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Stable record: catalog-task-cell-batch-integration

Applicable tests and references

Applicability is distinct from a completed evaluation.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual task guide. Dataset preparation, parameters and scoring must come from a separately identified protocol.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Diagram steps

["Select annotated datasets and protocol","Apply the integration method","Measure retained biological variation","Measure residual batch effects"]

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Diagram title

Conceptual evaluation workflow

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Entity type

Task guide; concrete protocol identities remain separate.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Datasets

No single dataset is fixed by this guide. Select a linked protocol and its versioned data release.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Organisms

No shared organism population is defined at this guide level. Record it for each selected dataset.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Assays

No single measurement assay is fixed by this guide; the endpoint and assay belong to the selected protocol.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Splits

No executable split is attached to this task identity. Use the selected protocol’s split manifest.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Allowed inputs

Single-cell measurements with batch labels and biological annotations; the chosen method may return a corrected matrix, embedding or graph.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Adaptation

No common fitting regime is imposed here. Keep pretrained, frozen, probed, fine-tuned and conventional methods distinct where applicable.

Individual claims
theislab/scib official source

Original source ↗

README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools

Version: cd67913396b4c0430710b3d90f1d1841f5fa4468
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:31:32.426513+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.6.value

Source artifact SHA-256: db7aa3a701778d541bf47d8214b50e1ce9f73e92dc3e810bfd740270e9e353aa

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: discovered

4 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: catalog-task-cell-batch-integration

areas
cells-tissues
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
Batch integration
scope note
Test whether cell identity is retained across donors and batches.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: broad_task_requires_concrete_protocol_links; primary sources: evidence-expansion-p2-evidence-discovery-final-scib-f65dd8b63336; inspected locators: Table1 tasks and integration-evaluation methods; result figures; searched queries: Batch integration primary paper benchmark results; gaps: Bio-conservation and batch-removal components depend on datasets and preprocessing. Figures do not justify new exact numerical scores; official source-data matrix extraction remains pending. Broad batch integration is not identical to scIB or Open Problems.; claim scope: Primary-source discovery and table/protocol screening; source checked is not independently reproduced. Raw acquisitions not automatically numerical publication approval.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_yet_extracted
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This record identifies the biological prediction question or a suite-specific task, rather than a uniquely fixed evaluated procedure. Preserve its task identity and leave split, model adaptation and scoring details on linked protocols/evaluations.; source ids: src-discovery-theislab-scib; source locator: README: Metrics, Biological Conservation, Batch Correction and Integration Tools; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction