rewire.it
Task

Bacterial promoter prediction

Bacterial promoter prediction evaluates whether a sequence model can distinguish promoter-labelled sequences under a specified dataset definition.

Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

0 evaluations · 0 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: source reviewed · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
Entity typeTask guide; concrete protocol identities remain separate.
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
DatasetsNo single dataset is fixed by this guide. Select a linked protocol and its versioned data release. · Not applicable
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
OrganismsNo shared organism population is defined at this guide level. Record it for each selected dataset. · Not applicable
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
AssaysNo single measurement assay is fixed by this guide; the endpoint and assay belong to the selected protocol. · Not applicable
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
SplitsNo executable split is attached to this task identity. Use the selected protocol’s split manifest. · Not applicable
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
Allowed inputsDNA sequences and promoter labels from a named reference dataset; organism and negative-set construction are protocol-specific.
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
AdaptationNo common fitting regime is imposed here. Keep pretrained, frozen, probed, fine-tuned and conventional methods distinct where applicable. · Not applicable
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
MetricsClassification metrics defined by the selected dataset and protocol; decision thresholds and class balance must be reported.
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
BaselinesDocumented sequence classifiers or simple composition controls may be candidates; no measured baseline value is supplied by this guide.
Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

How it works

How it worksConceptual evaluation workflow
Conceptual evaluation workflow1. Choose promoter labels and negatives. Then: 2. Fix organism or sequence holdout. Then: 3. Evaluate the defined classifier. Then: 4. Report classification and coverageConceptual evaluation workflow1. Choose promoter labels and negatives. Then: 2. Fix organism or sequence holdout. Then: 3. Evaluate the defined classifier. Then: 4. Report classification and coverageConceptual evaluation workflow1. Choose promoter labels and negatives. Then: 2. Fix organism or sequence holdout. Then: 3. Evaluate the defined classifier. Then: 4. Report classification and coverage

Conceptual task guide. Dataset preparation, parameters and scoring must come from a separately identified protocol.

Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
Choosing an evaluation

A concrete study must define what counts as a promoter, how negative examples are selected and which organisms or sequence groups are held out. Keep those decisions with the score. ProkBERT documents a promoter-prediction use case, but that implementation does not make every promoter dataset or split interchangeable.

Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
Task scope

This is a task guide, not a single versioned benchmark protocol. The connected resources provide examples or concrete procedures. A candidate method or proposed control is not evidence that an evaluation has been completed.

Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 0 evaluations · 0 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

No evaluations linked in this release.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
ProkBERT family: genomic language models for microbiome applicationsPMC full-text XML snapshot PMC10810988 at retrieval; byte-pinned by SHA-256Read source
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1331233

What is still missing

  • Broad bacterial promoter prediction includes other organisms and dataset constructions; one E. coli table is not a universal ranking.
Search and extraction details

broad task primary protocol linked

Searches

  • Open Problems single cell label projection benchmark v1.0.0 paper
  • CAPRI assessment rounds 46 54 protein docking results
  • GEARS predicting transcriptional outcomes multigene perturbations 2023
  • scVI scANVI reference mapping benchmark primary paper
  • Boltz-2 affinity benchmark paper
  • ESMFold monomer structure benchmark Science 2023
  • "ProkBERT" "paper" "2024"
  • "scPertEval"
  • ProkBERT family prokaryotic language models microbe paper
  • Probabilistic harmonization annotation single-cell transcriptomics scANVI Nature Methods 2021
  • Evolutionary-scale prediction atomic-level protein structure language model ESMFold Science Lin 2023
  • Towards Principled Evaluation Single-Cell Perturbation Prediction Models Schäfer 2026

Evidence locations

  • Sections 2.3 and 3.3
  • Table 3

Strengths and limitations

Strengths supported by sources

  • An explicit promoter-label task gives a sequence representation a measurable downstream endpoint.
    Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Limitations and conditions

  • A classifier can exploit how negatives were sampled. Transfer to another organism or promoter definition needs its own evaluation.
    Sourcesnbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md · ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples
Profile review details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Stable record: catalog-task-microbial-promoters

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual task guide. Dataset preparation, parameters and scoring must come from a separately identified protocol.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Choose promoter labels and negatives","Fix organism or sequence holdout","Evaluate the defined classifier","Report classification and coverage"]

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Conceptual evaluation workflow

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Entity type

Task guide; concrete protocol identities remain separate.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Datasets

No single dataset is fixed by this guide. Select a linked protocol and its versioned data release.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Organisms

No shared organism population is defined at this guide level. Record it for each selected dataset.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Assays

No single measurement assay is fixed by this guide; the endpoint and assay belong to the selected protocol.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Splits

No executable split is attached to this task identity. Use the selected protocol’s split manifest.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Allowed inputs

DNA sequences and promoter labels from a named reference dataset; organism and negative-set construction are protocol-specific.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Adaptation

No common fitting regime is imposed here. Keep pretrained, frozen, probed, fine-tuned and conventional methods distinct where applicable.

Individual claims
nbrg-ppcu/prokbert: README.md

Original source ↗

ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples

Version: 8670ae92b816cff158a0b85647a8dea122e251eb
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:46:19.913949+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.6.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 29de39c6ad006ce704ab14240cfd97af93da411fb63ec89ebe499c2646928cfc

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: discovered

4 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: catalog-task-microbial-promoters

areas
microbes-communities
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
Bacterial promoter prediction
scope note
Classify promoter activity from microbial DNA sequence.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: broad_task_primary_protocol_linked; primary sources: expansion-p3-prokbert; inspected locators: Sections 2.3 and 3.3; Table 3; searched queries: Open Problems single cell label projection benchmark v1.0.0 paper; CAPRI assessment rounds 46 54 protein docking results; GEARS predicting transcriptional outcomes multigene perturbations 2023; scVI scANVI reference mapping benchmark primary paper; Boltz-2 affinity benchmark paper; ESMFold monomer structure benchmark Science 2023; "ProkBERT" "paper" "2024"; "scPertEval"; ProkBERT family prokaryotic language models microbe paper; Probabilistic harmonization annotation single-cell transcriptomics scANVI Nature Methods 2021; Evolutionary-scale prediction atomic-level protein structure language model ESMFold Science Lin 2023; Towards Principled Evaluation Single-Cell Perturbation Prediction Models Schäfer 2026; gaps: Broad bacterial promoter prediction includes other organisms and dataset constructions; one E. coli table is not a universal ranking.; claim scope: Primary-paper discovery and source inspection. Source-checked results are not independently reproduced experiments.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_yet_extracted
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This record identifies the biological prediction question or a suite-specific task, rather than a uniquely fixed evaluated procedure. Preserve its task identity and leave split, model adaptation and scoring details on linked protocols/evaluations.; source ids: evidence-official-2efbfaba5a1c09f4f7fa; source locator: ProkBERT README: promoter prediction task and fine-tuning examples; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

    Suggest a correction