rewire.it
Task

protein function annotation

Protein-function annotation is evaluated within selected domain-containing protein families.

SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

1 evaluation · 1 metric row

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsCPF, SH3 and TRX family collections from UniProtKB/TrEMBL, with additional fungal SH3 sequences from NCBI.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
SplitsEach protein-family dataset has 80% training, 10% validation and 10% test data in Table 2. Three random initializations repeat training; the TRX training-size experiment keeps the validation and test sets fixed. These percentages do not establish a homology-disjoint split.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Table 2 header/footnote; §2.3 Family-specific model tuning; §3.3 and Table 3
MetricsThe source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
BaselinesClassical SVM/gradient-boosting/random-forest/KNN and neural CNN/LSTM/Transformer references; protein-model backbone comparisons form a separate TRX ablation.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Leakage controlsSequences are clustered to reduce high similarity before subsequent filtering.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
UncertaintyIndependent training seeds quantify initialization variation; the domain-span bootstrap is a separate uncertainty analysis.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
OrganismsProtein families CPF, SH3 and TRX; fungal SH3 sequences form an additional collection.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
AssaysUniProtKB/TrEMBL family/function annotations.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Allowed inputsProtein sequence representations.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
AdaptationESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.
SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

How it works

How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Protein sequence representations.. Then: 2. Evaluation: ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.. Then: 3. Readout: The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Protein sequence representations.. Then: 2. Evaluation: ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.. Then: 3. Readout: The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Protein sequence representations.. Then: 2. Evaluation: ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.. Then: 3. Readout: The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Evaluation methodology

CPF, SH3 and TRX family collections from UniProtKB/TrEMBL, with additional fungal SH3 sequences from NCBI. The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1. Classical SVM/gradient-boosting/random-forest/KNN and neural CNN/LSTM/Transformer references; protein-model backbone comparisons form a separate TRX ablation. Sequences are clustered to reduce high similarity before subsequent filtering. Independent training seeds quantify initialization variation; the domain-span bootstrap is a separate uncertainty analysis.

SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
SPIN + ESM2-35M: protein function annotation

frozen ESM2-35M backbone in SPIN

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.796 F1 macro-weighted

Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Table 1, ESM2-35M Test row, F1_m-w column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPINjournal full text in PMCRead source

What is still missing

  • complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.
  • exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.
Search and extraction details

primary comparison tables located

Searches

  • Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN 10.1093/bioadv/vbag064

Evidence locations

  • Table 1; XML table vbag064-T1
  • Table 2; XML table vbag064-T2

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

  • The 80/10/10 within-family split and repeated random initializations do not establish sequence-homology exclusion. Domain membership alone does not define the functional classes.
    SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Profile review details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Stable record: reported-task-c4a578065f44b2

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Input: Protein sequence representations.","Evaluation: ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.","Readout: The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1."]

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Computational evaluation flow

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets

CPF, SH3 and TRX family collections from UniProtKB/TrEMBL, with additional fungal SH3 sequences from NCBI.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits

Each protein-family dataset has 80% training, 10% validation and 10% test data in Table 2. Three random initializations repeat training; the TRX training-size experiment keeps the validation and test sets fixed. These percentages do not establish a homology-disjoint split.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Table 2 header/footnote; §2.3 Family-specific model tuning; §3.3 and Table 3

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation

ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics

The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines

Classical SVM/gradient-boosting/random-forest/KNN and neural CNN/LSTM/Transformer references; protein-model backbone comparisons form a separate TRX ablation.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls

Sequences are clustered to reduce high similarity before subsequent filtering.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty

Independent training seeds quantify initialization variation; the domain-span bootstrap is a separate uncertainty analysis.

Individual claims
Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN

Original source ↗

Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558225+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 9701843e93bf7fa3ead71e19693fb07d483f1022379871adfb04486783722a9d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-c4a578065f44b2

areas
proteins-complexes
tasks
protein function annotation
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
protein function annotation
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: primary_comparison_tables_located; primary sources: evidence-expansion-spin-protein-function-2026-9701843e; inspected locators: Table 1; XML table vbag064-T1; Table 2; XML table vbag064-T2; searched queries: Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN 10.1093/bioadv/vbag064; gaps: complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.; exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.; claim scope: Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: spin-protein-function-2026; source locator: Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction