Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Protein-function annotation is evaluated within selected domain-containing protein families.
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Datasets | CPF, SH3 and TRX family collections from UniProtKB/TrEMBL, with additional fungal SH3 sequences from NCBI.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Splits | Each protein-family dataset has 80% training, 10% validation and 10% test data in Table 2. Three random initializations repeat training; the TRX training-size experiment keeps the validation and test sets fixed. These percentages do not establish a homology-disjoint split.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Table 2 header/footnote; §2.3 Family-specific model tuning; §3.3 and Table 3 |
| Metrics | The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Baselines | Classical SVM/gradient-boosting/random-forest/KNN and neural CNN/LSTM/Transformer references; protein-model backbone comparisons form a separate TRX ablation.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Leakage controls | Sequences are clustered to reduce high similarity before subsequent filtering.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Uncertainty | Independent training seeds quantify initialization variation; the domain-span bootstrap is a separate uncertainty analysis.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Entity type | Paper-specific computational evaluation protocol.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Organisms | Protein families CPF, SH3 and TRX; fungal SH3 sequences form an additional collection.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Assays | UniProtKB/TrEMBL family/function annotations.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Allowed inputs | Protein sequence representations.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
| Adaptation | ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.SourcesScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages |
Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.
CPF, SH3 and TRX family collections from UniProtKB/TrEMBL, with additional fungal SH3 sequences from NCBI. The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1. Classical SVM/gradient-boosting/random-forest/KNN and neural CNN/LSTM/Transformer references; protein-model backbone comparisons form a separate TRX ablation. Sequences are clustered to reduce high similarity before subsequent filtering. Independent training seeds quantify initialization variation; the domain-span bootstrap is a separate uncertainty analysis.
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| SPIN + ESM2-35M: protein function annotation frozen ESM2-35M backbone in SPIN Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.796 F1 macro-weighted Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedScaling the profile of life by function with SPIN · Table 1, ESM2-35M Test row, F1_m-w column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
| Paper or primary resource | Version | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN | journal full text in PMC | Read source |
primary comparison tables located
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.
Stable record: reported-task-c4a578065f44b2Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram caption Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram steps ["Input: Protein sequence representations.","Evaluation: ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation.","Readout: The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1."] Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram title Computational evaluation flow Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Datasets CPF, SH3 and TRX family collections from UniProtKB/TrEMBL, with additional fungal SH3 sequences from NCBI. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Splits Each protein-family dataset has 80% training, 10% validation and 10% test data in Table 2. Three random initializations repeat training; the TRX training-size experiment keeps the validation and test sets fixed. These percentages do not establish a homology-disjoint split. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Table 2 header/footnote; §2.3 Family-specific model tuning; §3.3 and Table 3 Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Adaptation ESM2-35M fine-tuning with the Domain Span prediction module; the frozen-backbone configuration is a separate ablation. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Metrics The source defines a class-weighted macro F1 variant and weighted accuracy; these should not be assumed identical to ordinary macro F1. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Baselines Classical SVM/gradient-boosting/random-forest/KNN and neural CNN/LSTM/Transformer references; protein-model backbone comparisons form a separate TRX ablation. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Leakage controls Sequences are clustered to reduce high similarity before subsequent filtering. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Uncertainty Independent training seeds quantify initialization variation; the domain-span bootstrap is a separate uncertainty analysis. Individual claims | Scaling the profile of life by function with SPIN Methods §§2.6, 2.9; cached text lines 38–40, 48–50; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; Results embedding comparison and supervised-classifier comparison; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsRelevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-c4a578065f44b2