This paper-specific evaluation tests Simulated prophage-contig detection using 20 medium/high-complexity viral simulations.
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. This does not change the review status of its results.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Record type | Paper-specific task; protocol incompletely extractedSimulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, Vibrant row, Prophage F1 column; Table 3, VirSorter row, Prophage F1 column |
| Inputs | 20 medium/high-complexity viral simulationsSimulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, Vibrant row, Prophage F1 column; Table 3, VirSorter row, Prophage F1 column |
| Assessment | Average prophage F1Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, Vibrant row, Prophage F1 column; Table 3, VirSorter row, Prophage F1 column |
| Recorded split or evaluation setting | UnextractedSimulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, Vibrant row, Prophage F1 column; Table 3, VirSorter row, Prophage F1 column |
| Datasets | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Organisms | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Assays | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Adaptation | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Baselines | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Outline of the existing paper extraction. Split membership, fitting details and scorer implementation remain incompletely reviewed.
The existing paper extraction describes: Average across twenty medium- and high-complexity simulated communities. This description is retained with the exact evaluation records; it is not a new protocol reconstruction.
Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, Vibrant row, Prophage F1 column; Table 3, VirSorter row, Prophage F1 columnRelease 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| VIBRANT: Simulated prophage-contig detection Model: VIBRANT · Benchmark: Simulated prophage-contig detection · Dataset: 20 medium/high-complexity viral simulations Average across twenty medium- and high-complexity simulated communities. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.169 Average prophage F1 Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedSimulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, Vibrant row, Prophage F1 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| VirSorter: Simulated prophage-contig detection Model: VirSorter · Benchmark: Simulated prophage-contig detection · Dataset: 20 medium/high-complexity viral simulations Average across twenty medium- and high-complexity simulated communities. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.147 Average prophage F1 Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedSimulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools · Table 3, VirSorter row, Prophage F1 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Catalogue extraction inspected; protocol claims remain limited to the cited evidence. Missing details are not presumed absent from the original paper.
Stable record: reported-task-53e3d216eef6dbRelease 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-53e3d216eef6db