rewire.it
Configuration

PhageBoost

PhageBoost as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

SourcesLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Precision; XML row17 column2

1 evaluation · 6 metric rows

At a glance

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 6 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
PhageBoost: Genome-wide prophage detection

Scan complete genomes with overlapping windows and postprocess predictions into prophage regions. Genome-wide metrics are computed at region level and macro-averaged across genomes. Filtered gLM pipelines include normalization, smoothing, clustering and size filtering; these are not standalone encoder scores. 80 bacterial genomes,47 species,four phyla;386 annotated prophage locations.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.034 FPR

Unit: fraction · Direction: lower

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column FPR; XML row17 column5

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.680 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Recall; XML row17 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.494 F1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column F1; XML row17 column6

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.468 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Precision; XML row17 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.966 Specificity

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Specificity; XML row17 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.513 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column MCC; XML row17 column7

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

SourcesLAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models · Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Precision; XML row17 column2

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-model-c4701c1c48db925d22

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeNot extracted or verified for this record.
InputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
OutputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
ParametersNot extracted or verified for this record.
Known versionsNot extracted or verified for this record.
Training dataNot extracted or verified for this record.
Context limitsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AccessNot extracted or verified for this record.
Code licenceNot extracted or verified for this record.
Weights licenceNot extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Evaluation in this paper

Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

Individual claims
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models

Original source ↗

Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Precision; XML row17 column2

Version: PMC13041943.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.sections.0.body

Source artifact SHA-256: 22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Introduction

PhageBoost as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

Individual claims
LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models

Original source ↗

Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Precision; XML row17 column2

Version: PMC13041943.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:21.006973+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.summary

Source artifact SHA-256: 22c2e218e87dce757907f6086a0e2ad37c13f785b34fff5bea7cfa1a6c276b16

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-model-c4701c1c48db925d22

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
Genome-wide prophage detection
entity level
method
configuration type
reported_configuration
version
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: part2-lambda-prophage-2026; source locator: Table 5., row PhageBoost, column Precision; XML row17 column2; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.
Related records

Suggest a correction