rewire.it
Configuration

Random chemical generation (main)

Random chemical generation as evaluated in the cited study. MassSpecGym paper baseline; mass-conditioned random generation; main challenge

SourcesMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 accuracy

1 evaluation · 6 metric rows

At a glance

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 6 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Random chemical generation (main): MassSpecGym · main

Generate candidate molecules from an input spectrum. Compare within the same main/formula challenge and metric. Main random generation uses precursor mass; the Transformer consumes the spectrum. MCES single-linkage molecular clustering at threshold 10; fixed held-out test split

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

28.59 (28.33-28.84) Top-1 MCES

Unit: edge-edit distance · Direction: lower

Uncertainty: type: bootstrap confidence interval; level: 0.999; resamples: 20000; lower: 28.33; upper: 28.84

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 MCES

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.00 Top-10 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-10 accuracy

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

25.72 (25.49-25.95) Top-10 MCES

Unit: edge-edit distance · Direction: lower

Uncertainty: type: bootstrap confidence interval; level: 0.999; resamples: 20000; lower: 25.49; upper: 25.95

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-10 MCES

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.10 (0.10 - 0.10) Top-10 Tanimoto

Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: type: bootstrap confidence interval; level: 0.999; resamples: 20000; lower: 0.10; upper: 0.10

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-10 Tanimoto

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.00 Top-1 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 accuracy

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.07 (0.07 - 0.07) Top-1 Tanimoto

Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: type: bootstrap confidence interval; level: 0.999; resamples: 20000; lower: 0.07; upper: 0.07

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 Tanimoto

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

MassSpecGym paper baseline; mass-conditioned random generation; main challenge

SourcesMassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules · Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 accuracy

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-model-cb9bbe4a42591d34aa

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeNot extracted or verified for this record.
InputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
OutputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
ParametersNot extracted or verified for this record.
Known versionsNot extracted or verified for this record.
Training dataNot extracted or verified for this record.
Context limitsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AccessNot extracted or verified for this record.
Code licenceNot extracted or verified for this record.
Weights licenceNot extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Evaluation in this paper

MassSpecGym paper baseline; mass-conditioned random generation; main challenge

Individual claims
MassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules

Original source ↗

Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 accuracy

Version: 2410.23326v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:11.146650+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.sections.0.body

Source artifact SHA-256: 82176d50e8947c8b9baa2a0d91493f5680c0e4c7e25a2266ff7879f48a58c40c

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Introduction

Random chemical generation as evaluated in the cited study. MassSpecGym paper baseline; mass-conditioned random generation; main challenge

Individual claims
MassSpecGym: A benchmark for the discovery and identification of molecules

Original source ↗

Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 accuracy

Version: 2410.23326v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:11.146650+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.summary

Source artifact SHA-256: 82176d50e8947c8b9baa2a0d91493f5680c0e4c7e25a2266ff7879f48a58c40c

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-model-cb9bbe4a42591d34aa

areas
metabolomics
entity level
method
configuration type
reported_configuration
version
MassSpecGym paper baseline; mass-conditioned random generation; main challenge
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: part2-massspecgym-arxiv-v1; source locator: Table 2, main challenge, Random chemical generation, Top-1 accuracy; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.
Related records

Suggest a correction