rewire.it
Dataset

CASF-2016 docking

Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 9 evaluations · 27 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
K DEEP · 0.0010: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

44.6% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

24.8% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

36.3% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

AK-score-single · 0.0001: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

34.9% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

56.1% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

AK-score-ensemble · 0.0007: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

59.7 % Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

36.0 % Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

51.4 % Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

AK-score-single · 0.0005: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

29.9% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

54.0% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

43.2% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

AK-score-single · 0.0007: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

57.9% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

47.1% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

31.3% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

AK-score-single · 0.0010: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

43.9% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

26.3% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

54.0% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

K DEEP · 0.0001: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

24.8% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

38.5% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

K DEEP · 0.0006: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

49.6% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

39.9% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

29.1% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

K DEEP · 0.0005: CASF-2016 docking

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

49.6% Top 3 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 9: CASF-2016 docking Top 3 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

29.1% Top 1 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

39.9% Top 2 success

Unit: percent · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 8: CASF-2016 docking Top 2 success

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.reported_population

No value recorded

Context-only references
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Original source ↗

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.436853+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.reported_population

Source artifact SHA-256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Context-only references
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Original source ↗

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.436853+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.split

Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.

Context-only references
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Original source ↗

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.436853+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.subset

No value recorded

Context-only references
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Original source ↗

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.436853+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.subset

Source artifact SHA-256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

description

Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.

Context-only references
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Original source ↗

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.436853+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

name

CASF-2016 docking

Context-only references
AK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Original source ↗

A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.436853+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-dataset-30865ab989a9b4a55d

areas
molecular-interactions
tasks
Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring
split
Training uses 3,772 PDBbind-2016 refined-set complexes after removal of the 285-complex core test set. CASF separates scoring, ranking and docking power.
subset
Not reported
reported population
Not reported
source locator
A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success
missing metadata
manifest: unextracted; scored count: unreported
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This record identifies a biological data collection or source-labelled evaluation cohort. Keep its dataset identity; split, assay, taxonomic level, candidate restrictions and comparison context remain attributes rather than automatically becoming new entity kinds.; source ids: akscore-2020; source locator: A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset.; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 3 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 4 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 5 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 6 K DEEP, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 7 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 8 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 9 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 10 AK-score-single, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; Table 2 (ijms-21-08424-t002), row 11 AK-score-ensemble, column 7: CASF-2016 docking Top 1 success; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction