rewire.it
dataset · needs review

CASF-2016 blind docked poses

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
DiffDock-NMDN: Protein–ligand virtual screening

NMDN scoring on DiffDock-NMDN blind docked poses; not ligand-pose RMSD.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

66.7 Forward-screening success rate

Unit: % · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedNormalized Protein–Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening · Table 2, DiffDock-NMDN / NMDN row, success rate (%) column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Vina: Protein–ligand virtual screening

Vina scoring on the same DiffDock-NMDN blind docked poses; not ligand-pose RMSD.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

42.1 Forward-screening success rate

Unit: % · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedNormalized Protein–Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening · Table 2, Vina scoring row, success rate (%) column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-dataset-065b9fcc8da573

areas
molecular-interactions
version
Not reported
split
Not reported
missing metadata
version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; accession: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
Related records

Suggest a correction