PDBbind core v2016
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| DEELIG: Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction Source paper reports DEELIG on PDBbind core set. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.889 Pearson R Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedDEELIG: A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity · Table 2, DEELIG row, PDBbind v2016 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| TOPBP (Complex): Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction Model: TOPBP (Complex) · Benchmark: Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction · Dataset: PDBbind core v2016 Source table compiles a previously published comparator; protocol equivalence is not established. Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.861 Pearson R Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedDEELIG: A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity · Table 2, TOPBP (Complex) row, PDBbind v2016 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
- DEELIG: A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity · Original source · PMC archival version PMC8274096.1
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: reported-dataset-327cfcdae0c937
- areas
- molecular-interactions
- version
- v2016
- split
- Not reported
- missing metadata
- split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; accession: not_reported_in_legacy_extract