evaluation · needs review

TOPBP (Complex): Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction

Evaluation procedure

Source table compiles a previously published comparator; protocol equivalence is not established.

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
TOPBP (Complex): Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction Model: TOPBP (Complex) · Benchmark: Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction · Dataset: PDBbind core v2016 Source table compiles a previously published comparator; protocol equivalence is not established. Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.861 Pearson R Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedDEELIG: A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity · Table 2, TOPBP (Complex) row, PDBbind v2016 column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-b3-043

areas: molecular-interactions
tasks: Protein–ligand binding affinity prediction
origin: paper_compilation
protocol: Source table compiles a previously published comparator; protocol equivalence is not established.
version: Not reported
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: v2016; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; original evaluation: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records