rewire.it
Dataset subset

GENEB representative task subset (GENEB split)

The split of GENEB representative task subset that GENEB evaluated on. The upstream dataset release is not catalogued here, so no claim is made that this matches its original splits.

Subset and evaluation context

This record describes a particular subset or cohort used in an evaluation. Its results do not describe the full dataset.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 22 evaluations · 22 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
GENA-LM-Large-T2T on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.530 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GENA-LM-Large-T2T), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENA-LM-Large-T2T on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.535 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GENA-LM-Large-T2T), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENERator-Eukaryote-1.2B on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.579 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GENERator-Eukaryote-1.2B), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENERator-Eukaryote-1.2B on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.595 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GENERator-Eukaryote-1.2B), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENERator-Eukaryote-3B on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.605 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GENERator-Eukaryote-3B), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENERator-Eukaryote-3B on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.609 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GENERator-Eukaryote-3B), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GenomeOcean-4B on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.552 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GenomeOcean-4B), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GenomeOcean-4B on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.552 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GenomeOcean-4B), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GenomeOcean-500M on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.536 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GenomeOcean-500M), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GenomeOcean-500M on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.535 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GenomeOcean-500M), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GROVER on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.466 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GROVER), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GROVER on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.477 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(GROVER), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

HyenaDNA-Large-1M on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.427 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(HyenaDNA-Large-1M), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

HyenaDNA-Large-1M on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.479 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(HyenaDNA-Large-1M), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

LucaOne on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.573 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

LucaOne on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.600 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(LucaOne), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

MutBERT on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.516 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(MutBERT), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

MutBERT on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.517 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(MutBERT), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

NT-v2-50M-MS on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.511 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(NT-v2-50M-MS), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

NT-v2-50M-MS on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.521 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(NT-v2-50M-MS), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Omni-DNA-1B on GENEB LINEAR-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, linear probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.550 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(Omni-DNA-1B), column(Linear MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Omni-DNA-1B on GENEB MLP-PROBE: Average macro-MCC across the 13 representative tasks, MLP probe

Frozen embeddings scored with a probe over the thirteen representative tasks, one from each functional category (Table 7).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.542 macro_mcc

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare · Table 8, row(Omni-DNA-1B), column(MLP MCC)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
description

The split of GENEB representative task subset that GENEB evaluated on. The upstream dataset release is not catalogued here, so no claim is made that this matches its original splits.

Context-only references
GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Version: 2606.04525v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:09.460928+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 47975089c0ca738d5e2d6e6ea91cd4e7b80498c3f175803d8ec39ca77aa41629

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

name

GENEB representative task subset (GENEB split)

Context-only references
GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare

Original source ↗

No field-specific location recorded

Version: 2606.04525v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:09.460928+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 47975089c0ca738d5e2d6e6ea91cd4e7b80498c3f175803d8ec39ca77aa41629

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: geneb-dataset-geneb-representative-task-subset

areas
dna-genomes
missing metadata
version: unreported; url: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction