evaluation · needs review

scGPT: Cell-type identification

Evaluation procedure

Native scLLM cell-type identification as reported in Table 2.

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
scGPT: Cell-type identification Model: scGPT · Benchmark: Cell-type identification · Dataset: M.S. single-cell dataset Native scLLM cell-type identification as reported in Table 2. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.734 F1-Score Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedParameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Enhances Adaptation of Single Cell Large Language Model for Cell Type Identification · Table 2, M.S. / scGPT row, F1-Score column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-025

areas: cells-tissues
tasks: Cell-type identification
origin: independent_paper
protocol: Native scLLM cell-type identification as reported in Table 2.
version: Not reported
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records