evaluation · needs review

AK-score-ensemble: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring

Evaluation procedure

CASF-2016 scoring-power evaluation.

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
AK-score-ensemble: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring Model: AK-score-ensemble · Benchmark: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring · Dataset: CASF-2016 CASF-2016 scoring-power evaluation. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.812 Pearson R Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2, AK-score-ensemble / learning rate 0.0007 row, Scoring Pearson (R) column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-b3-048

areas: molecular-interactions
tasks: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring
origin: author_reported
protocol: CASF-2016 scoring-power evaluation.
version: ensemble; learning rate 0.0007
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records