Protocol

Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction (AlphaGenome paper)

Can reference sequence predict the difference in contact organization between H1-hESC and HFF cells?

Sources (3)

AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41

2 evaluations · 2 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
Property	Description and evidence
Dataset and biological context	H1-hESC and HFFc6 Micro-C datasets matching Orca’s evaluation. Sources (3) AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
Split	Intersection of Orca test chromosomes9/10 with AlphaGenome/Borzoi fold-0 held-out intervals. Sources (3) AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
Allowed inputs and adaptation	Reference DNA; contact maps resized from AlphaGenome native bins to Orca’s 4-kb grid using bilinear interpolation. Sources (3) AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
Metrics as reported	Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr Sources (3) AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
Aggregation	Mean Pearson correlation across held-out interval evaluations; the difference-map endpoint is distinct from individual-cell-type accuracy. Sources (3) AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
Uncertainty	Not reported for these summary-table scores. · Not reported in inspected sources Sources (3) AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
Organisms	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Assays	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Baselines	Not extracted or verified for this record.

How it works

How it worksCell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluation procedure

Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.

Sources (3)

What is tested

Can reference sequence predict the difference in contact organization between H1-hESC and HFF cells?

Sources (3)

Procedure

Reimplement the Orca H1-hESC minus HFF difference evaluation on the same held-out windows.

Sources (3)

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Published comparisons

Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies.

Comparison and metric

Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction (AlphaGenome paper)

Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr (correlation) · Higher values are better for this metric.

Can reference sequence predict the difference in contact organization between H1-hESC and HFF cells?

Evaluation protocol · Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluated data subset

AlphaGenome fold-0 contact-map model, bilinearly resized to Orca 4 kb bins · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.42
Orca (paper Table 3) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.294

Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K41; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J41

Values, uncertainty and evidence

Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr: original source values
Tested entity	Printed value	Uncertainty	Evidence
AlphaGenome fold-0 contact-map model, bilinearly resized to Orca 4 kb bins · Configuration	0.42 correlation	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K41
Orca (paper Table 3) · Configuration	0.294 correlation	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J41

Scope and limitations

This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.
Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.
Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.

Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-17. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
AlphaGenome fold-0 contact-map model, bilinearly resized to Orca 4 kb bins: Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction Configuration: AlphaGenome fold-0 contact-map model, bilinearly resized to Orca 4 kb binsProtocol: Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction (AlphaGenome paper)Dataset subset: Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluated data subset Reimplement the Orca H1-hESC minus HFF difference evaluation on the same held-out windows. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.42 Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr Unit: correlation · Direction: higher Aggregation: Mean Pearson correlation across held-out interval evaluations; the difference-map endpoint is distinct from individual-cell-type accuracy.	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K41 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
Orca (paper Table 3): Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction Configuration: Orca (paper Table 3)Protocol: Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction (AlphaGenome paper)Dataset subset: Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluated data subset Reimplement the Orca H1-hESC minus HFF difference evaluation on the same held-out windows. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.294 Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr Unit: correlation · Direction: higher Aggregation: Mean Pearson correlation across held-out interval evaluations; the difference-map endpoint is distinct from individual-cell-type accuracy.	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J41 Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Original Nature paper comparison; numerical source transcription was separately reviewed. No independent model execution.

Paper or primary resource	Version	Reference
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML	Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied	Read source
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables	Nature version of record, 28 January 2026	Read source DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-10014-0
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods	Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned	Read source

What is still missing

Individual protocol input manifests, scoring counts and uncertainty remain unextracted where explicitly marked.
Subsequent studies use different datasets and are not pooled with this paper.

Search and extraction details

complete comparison extracted

Searches

AlphaGenome benchmark evaluation Nature 2026 supplementary Tables 3 4 regulatory variant prediction
AlphaGenome independent evaluation benchmark 2026 variant effects

Evidence locations

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

Resampling changes the grid and is part of this protocol. Do not treat native AlphaGenome resolution or the cell-difference endpoint as interchangeable with the tabulated 4-kb per-cell evaluation.
Sources (3)
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41
This is an author-reported protocol, not a rewire rerun. Different datasets, processing and adaptations cannot support an unrestricted leaderboard.
Sources (3)
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Stable record: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-24

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

42 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Diagram caption Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below. Individual claims	alphagenome: Journal full-text XML Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.caption` Source artifact SHA-256: `d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36` Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes Format: original_artifact Inspected artifact
Diagram caption Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below. Individual claims	AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.caption` Source artifact SHA-256: `86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0` Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes Format: original_pdf Inspected artifact
Diagram caption Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below. Individual claims	AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.caption` Source artifact SHA-256: `833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154` Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes Format: xlsx Inspected artifact
Diagram steps ["Shared held-out chromosome intervals","Resize predictions to Orca grid","Subtract matched cell-type maps","Compute interval Pearson correlations"] Individual claims	alphagenome: Journal full-text XML Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.steps` Source artifact SHA-256: `d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36` Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes Format: original_artifact Inspected artifact
Diagram steps ["Shared held-out chromosome intervals","Resize predictions to Orca grid","Subtract matched cell-type maps","Compute interval Pearson correlations"] Individual claims	AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.steps` Source artifact SHA-256: `86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0` Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes Format: original_pdf Inspected artifact
Diagram steps ["Shared held-out chromosome intervals","Resize predictions to Orca grid","Subtract matched cell-type maps","Compute interval Pearson correlations"] Individual claims	AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.steps` Source artifact SHA-256: `833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154` Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes Format: xlsx Inspected artifact
Diagram title Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluation procedure Individual claims	alphagenome: Journal full-text XML Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.title` Source artifact SHA-256: `d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36` Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes Format: original_artifact Inspected artifact
Diagram title Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluation procedure Individual claims	AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.title` Source artifact SHA-256: `86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0` Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes Format: original_pdf Inspected artifact
Diagram title Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction: evaluation procedure Individual claims	AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.diagram.title` Source artifact SHA-256: `833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154` Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes Format: xlsx Inspected artifact
Dataset and biological context H1-hESC and HFFc6 Micro-C datasets matching Orca’s evaluation. Individual claims	alphagenome: Journal full-text XML Original source ↗ 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.facts.0.value` Source artifact SHA-256: `d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36` Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes Format: original_artifact Inspected artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

3 source records and release history

AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · Original source · Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods · Original source · Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · Original source · Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-24

areas: dna-genomes
entity level: protocol
version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
source evaluation index: 24
source table: 3
reference levels: metric: Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr; printed value: 0; numeric value: 0; source locator: Suppl Table 3 Track performance!H41; note: Source reference quantity for relative-performance calculation, not a measured baseline run.
comparison panels: id: paper-figure-de9ea9e22d369e009b; title: Cell-type difference in chromatin contact-map prediction (AlphaGenome paper); protocol id: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-24; dataset id: alphagenome-2026-t3-dataset-24; metric: Cell-type difference @4kb pearsonr; unit: correlation; direction: higher; result ids: alphagenome-2026-result-83d43770ee42d153; alphagenome-2026-result-da6facb94a4f13eb; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source locator: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K41; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J41; context: Can reference sequence predict the difference in contact organization between H1-hESC and HFF cells?; caveats: This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.; Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.; Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
benchmark research: review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_comparison_extracted; primary sources: evidence-official-56e5abfb5f12f1cd3b20; source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source-alphagenome-nature2026-supplementary-methods; inspected locators: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41; searched queries: AlphaGenome benchmark evaluation Nature 2026 supplementary Tables 3 4 regulatory variant prediction; AlphaGenome independent evaluation benchmark 2026 variant effects; gaps: Individual protocol input manifests, scoring counts and uncertainty remain unextracted where explicitly marked.; Subsequent studies use different datasets and are not pooled with this paper.; claim scope: Original Nature paper comparison; numerical source transcription was separately reviewed. No independent model execution.
legacy kinds: benchmark
entity classification: review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: The source-backed record identifies a specified evaluated procedure and its dataset/split/scoring context. Classify it as a protocol while preserving version and comparison restrictions.; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source-alphagenome-nature2026-supplementary-methods; evidence-official-56e5abfb5f12f1cd3b20; source locator: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A41:N41; Supplementary Methods pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; methods: pp.23–24, Contact Maps Performance; paper: Extended Data Fig.4; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 24; sheet rows 41; ambiguities: None recorded

Related records

Suggest a correction