rewire.it
Protocol

Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction (AlphaGenome paper)

Can reference sequence predict the spatial distribution of RNA-seq coverage at nucleotide resolution?

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

2 evaluations · 4 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
Dataset and biological contextBorzoi-matched RNA-seq tracks reprocessed at base resolution; retain highly concordant tracks and mask Borzoi unmappable positions.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
SplitHeld-out human genomic intervals under the relevant fold. General training follows Borzoi folds, extending intervals to the AlphaGenome context and removing validation/test windows overlapping training after extension; use the comparison-specific split below rather than the variant chromosome split. This comparison uses Borzoi fold-1.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
Allowed inputs and adaptationReference sequence; the additional AlphaGenome RNA-seq head and unscaled Borzoi predictions repeated across each original 32-bp bin.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
Metrics as reportedTrack @1bp (log1p scale pearsonr); Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr)
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
AggregationPearson correlation; genome-track methods average individual track correlations for assay groups.
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
UncertaintyNot reported for these summary-table scores. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
OrganismsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AssaysNot extracted or verified for this record.
BaselinesNot extracted or verified for this record.

How it works

How it worksBase-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure
Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure1. Matched held-out RNA tracks. Then: 2. Restore common signal scale. Then: 3. Upsample Borzoi and mask unmappable positions. Then: 4. Compare normal/log1p correlationsBase-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure1. Matched held-out RNA tracks. Then: 2. Restore common signal scale. Then: 3. Upsample Borzoi and mask unmappable positions. Then: 4. Compare normal/log1p correlationsBase-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure1. Matched held-out RNA tracks. Then: 2. Restore common signal scale. Then: 3. Upsample Borzoi and mask unmappable positions. Then: 4. Compare normal/log1p correlations

Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
What is tested

Can reference sequence predict the spatial distribution of RNA-seq coverage at nucleotide resolution?

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
Procedure

Compare base-resolution measured coverage with both predictions on normal and log1p scales, keeping these as separate endpoints.

Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Published comparisons

Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies.

Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction (AlphaGenome paper)

Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr) (correlation) · Higher values are better for this metric.

Can reference sequence predict the spatial distribution of RNA-seq coverage at nucleotide resolution?

Evaluation protocol · Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluated data subset

  1. Borzoi (paper Table 3) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.460

Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K10
Values, uncertainty and evidence
Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr): original source values
Tested entityPrinted valueUncertaintyEvidence
Borzoi (paper Table 3) · Configuration0.460 correlationNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J10
AlphaGenome Borzoi-fold-1 model fine-tuned with base-resolution Borzoi RNA-seq head · Configuration0.59 correlationNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K10
Scope and limitations
  • This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.
  • Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.
  • Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.

Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-17. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 2 evaluations · 4 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Borzoi (paper Table 3): Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction

Compare base-resolution measured coverage with both predictions on normal and log1p scales, keeping these as separate endpoints.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.460 Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr)

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Aggregation: Pearson correlation; genome-track methods average individual track correlations for assay groups.

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J10

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.750 Track @1bp (log1p scale pearsonr)

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Aggregation: Pearson correlation; genome-track methods average individual track correlations for assay groups.

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J11

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

AlphaGenome Borzoi-fold-1 model fine-tuned with base-resolution Borzoi RNA-seq head: Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction

Compare base-resolution measured coverage with both predictions on normal and log1p scales, keeping these as separate endpoints.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.80 Track @1bp (log1p scale pearsonr)

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Aggregation: Pearson correlation; genome-track methods average individual track correlations for assay groups.

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K11

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.59 Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr)

Unit: correlation · Direction: higher

Aggregation: Pearson correlation; genome-track methods average individual track correlations for assay groups.

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K10

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Original Nature paper comparison; numerical source transcription was separately reviewed. No independent model execution.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
alphagenome: Journal full-text XMLRetrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision suppliedRead source
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tablesNature version of record, 28 January 2026Read source
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-10014-0
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methodsSupplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinnedRead source

What is still missing

  • Individual protocol input manifests, scoring counts and uncertainty remain unextracted where explicitly marked.
  • Subsequent studies use different datasets and are not pooled with this paper.
Search and extraction details

complete comparison extracted

Searches

  • AlphaGenome benchmark evaluation Nature 2026 supplementary Tables 3 4 regulatory variant prediction
  • AlphaGenome independent evaluation benchmark 2026 variant effects

Evidence locations

  • 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

  • Upsampled Borzoi output has no new sub-bin information; normal-scale gains partly reflect exon-boundary resolution. The paper restricts inclusion to tracks meeting its data-concordance check.
    Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
  • This is an author-reported protocol, not a rewire rerun. Different datasets, processing and adaptations cannot support an unrestricted leaderboard.
    Sources (3)AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables; AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods; alphagenome: Journal full-text XML · 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training
Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Stable record: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-5

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

42 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.

Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.

Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited procedure; model-specific conditions are given below.

Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Matched held-out RNA tracks","Restore common signal scale","Upsample Borzoi and mask unmappable positions","Compare normal/log1p correlations"]

Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Matched held-out RNA tracks","Restore common signal scale","Upsample Borzoi and mask unmappable positions","Compare normal/log1p correlations"]

Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Matched held-out RNA tracks","Restore common signal scale","Upsample Borzoi and mask unmappable positions","Compare normal/log1p correlations"]

Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure

Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure

Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary methods

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Supplement to Nature version of record, 28 January 2026; content hash pinned
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:37:01.778972+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 86b2e6a07543e3c201e2e157a3e9c6eb5235ff13eb8a5224f6fcb6fe1808d4c0

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact publisher PDF bytes

Format: original_pdf

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction: evaluation procedure

Individual claims
AlphaGenome Nature 2026 supplementary comparison tables

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T06:31:06.887921+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 833cb78b6ae6fe39415cfff296ac00c48d800326139f13eb307531a1cc133154

Hash scope: SHA-256 of exact retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: xlsx

Inspected artifact

Dataset and biological context

Borzoi-matched RNA-seq tracks reprocessed at base resolution; retain highly concordant tracks and mask Borzoi unmappable positions.

Individual claims
alphagenome: Journal full-text XML

Original source ↗

'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved page snapshot; no immutable publisher revision supplied
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:53:03.009088+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated source review. No human sign-off or independent experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: d159b791fc6cb7b679c151727b7b05a6e5b6388b08a89b675014983d85b6df36

Hash scope: SHA-256 of retrieved original artifact bytes

Format: original_artifact

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

3 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-5

areas
dna-genomes
entity level
protocol
version
Nature version of record, 28 January 2026
source evaluation index
5
source table
3
reference levels
metric: Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr); printed value: 0; numeric value: 0; source locator: Suppl Table 3 Track performance!H10; note: Source reference quantity for relative-performance calculation, not a measured baseline run.; metric: Track @1bp (log1p scale pearsonr); printed value: 0; numeric value: 0; source locator: Suppl Table 3 Track performance!H11; note: Source reference quantity for relative-performance calculation, not a measured baseline run.
comparison panels
id: paper-figure-8386b0541f037485a4; title: Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction (AlphaGenome paper); protocol id: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-5; dataset id: alphagenome-2026-t3-dataset-5; metric: Track @1bp (normal scale pearsonr); unit: correlation; direction: higher; result ids: alphagenome-2026-result-79a4f4e2e0c4b236; alphagenome-2026-result-9f00e9eb53838702; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source locator: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K10; context: Can reference sequence predict the spatial distribution of RNA-seq coverage at nucleotide resolution?; caveats: This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.; Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.; Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: paper-figure-bc86ad58ab38b5c81b; title: Base-resolution RNA-seq prediction (AlphaGenome paper); protocol id: alphagenome-2026-t3-protocol-5; dataset id: alphagenome-2026-t3-dataset-5; metric: Track @1bp (log1p scale pearsonr); unit: correlation; direction: higher; result ids: alphagenome-2026-result-8afbbf27535ee23d; alphagenome-2026-result-f84062873874488e; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source locator: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!K11; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!J11; context: Can reference sequence predict the spatial distribution of RNA-seq coverage at nucleotide resolution?; caveats: This is the AlphaGenome paper’s comparison. Source-checked scores are not independent reproductions.; Model inputs, training and inference budgets differ or remain partly unextracted. This figure does not establish a controlled architectural advantage.; Superseded and quarantined score conflicts are excluded; comparator-specific subsets remain separate.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_comparison_extracted; primary sources: evidence-official-56e5abfb5f12f1cd3b20; source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source-alphagenome-nature2026-supplementary-methods; inspected locators: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training; searched queries: AlphaGenome benchmark evaluation Nature 2026 supplementary Tables 3 4 regulatory variant prediction; AlphaGenome independent evaluation benchmark 2026 variant effects; gaps: Individual protocol input manifests, scoring counts and uncertainty remain unextracted where explicitly marked.; Subsequent studies use different datasets and are not pooled with this paper.; claim scope: Original Nature paper comparison; numerical source transcription was separately reviewed. No independent model execution.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: The source-backed record identifies a specified evaluated procedure and its dataset/split/scoring context. Classify it as a protocol while preserving version and comparison restrictions.; source ids: source-alphagenome-nature2026-tables; source-alphagenome-nature2026-supplementary-methods; evidence-official-56e5abfb5f12f1cd3b20; source locator: 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A10:N10; 'Suppl Table 3 Track performance'!A11:N11; Supplementary Methods pp.22,24, Gene Expression Correlation and Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; methods: pp.21–22, Genome Track Evaluation / Gene Expression Correlation; methods: p.24, Benchmarking Against Borzoi Track Predictions; paper: Extended Data Fig.3c,d; tables: Suppl Table 3 Track performance; evaluation index 5; sheet rows 10, 11; methods: p.19, Training / Pre-training; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction