Result

0.68 mcc

NT-MS · BEND GENE-FINDING · MCC

Tested method: NT-MS
Task: BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene finding
Dataset subset: GENCODE (BEND split)
Procedure: A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1.
Evaluation: NT-MS on BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene finding
Evidence: Author-reported evaluation · source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-MS), column(Gene finding)

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Methods and reproduction

BEND evaluation of NT-MS on Gene finding, scored with MCC.

task: BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene finding
method: NT-MS
dataset subset: GENCODE (BEND split)
Split: Not reported
Adaptation: Not reported
Scoring implementation: MCC

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Access requirements and official instructions: BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene finding

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.

Evaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
NT-MS on BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene finding Method: NT-MSTask: BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene findingDataset subset: GENCODE (BEND split) A downstream head trained on frozen embeddings, except for the expert methods and the fully supervised baselines, which are trained end to end. Metric and splits are from Table 1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked
0.68 mcc Unit: correlation · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: Not reported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedBEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Table 3, row(NT-MS), column(Gene finding) Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Reported result 0.68 Individual claims	BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks Original source ↗ Table 3, row(NT-MS), column(Gene finding) Version: Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256 Retrieved: 2026-09-17T08:06:28.183228+00:00	source checked Deterministic parse of the pinned PDF text layer, with row and column counts asserted · 2026-09-18 author reported Audit details Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied. Field: `attributes.printed_value` Source artifact SHA-256: `f709b6bef3120eb979c0a0e02d2582475c49410f29850ed7601ba7a700ca379d` Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact Extraction artifact SHA-256: `f709b6bef3120eb979c0a0e02d2582475c49410f29850ed7601ba7a700ca379d` Extraction artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release history

BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · Original source · Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: bend-result-nt-ms-gene-finding-mcc

areas: dna-genomes
tasks: Gene finding
metric: mcc
metric direction: higher
unit: correlation
printed value: 0.68
numeric value: 0.68
uncertainty: Not reported
source locator: Table 3, row(NT-MS), column(Gene finding)
missing metadata: denominator: unextracted; seeds: unreported
review: method: Deterministic parse of the pinned PDF text layer, with row and column counts asserted; reviewer: Codex research agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-09-18; artifact sha256: f709b6bef3120eb979c0a0e02d2582475c49410f29850ed7601ba7a700ca379d; retrieval url: https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/429e7b31625a8b7839f9e4d6e2aa9bb9-Paper-Conference.pdf; notes: Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.

Related records

evaluation: NT-MS on BEND GENE-FINDING: Gene finding

Suggest a correction