rewire.it
result · source checked

0.759 Pearson R

AK-score-single · Pearson R · CASF-2016

Tested model
AK-score-single
Task or benchmark
Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring
Dataset
CASF-2016
Procedure
CASF-2016 scoring-power evaluation.
Evaluation
AK-score-single: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2, AK-score-single / learning rate 0.0007 row, Scoring Pearson (R) column

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
AK-score-single: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring

CASF-2016 scoring-power evaluation.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.759 Pearson R

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedAK-Score: Accurate Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Using an Ensemble of 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks · Table 2, AK-score-single / learning rate 0.0007 row, Scoring Pearson (R) column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: source checked

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-b3-049

areas
molecular-interactions
tasks
Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring
printed value
0.759
numeric value
0.759
metric
Pearson R
metric direction
unknown
unit
unitless
uncertainty
Not reported
source locator
Table 2, AK-score-single / learning rate 0.0007 row, Scoring Pearson (R) column
review
method: independent_ai_table_review; reviewer: Codex omics research agent; independent source-table review, not human review; reviewed at: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.437894+00:00; notes: CASF-2016 scoring Pearson R with learning rate0.0007. Single-model versus ensemble blocks kept distinct; ranking/docking scores not substituted. Source check verifies central value and table context, not experiment reproduction or all metadata.; evidence: {"table_xml_id": "ijms-21-08424-t002", "row_cells": ["", "0.0007", "0.759", "0.616", "0.526", "0.640", "31.3", "47.1", "57.9"], "selected_cell_zero_based": 2, "selected_cell_xml": "<td align=\"center\" valign=\"middle\" rowspan=\"1\" colspan=\"1\">0.759</td>", "caption": "A comparison of prediction accuracy with the CASF-2016 dataset."}; artifact sha256: 40cfd28dcd587599768ec99a6590ec593486475ff01c7b1d1f229b44aa91bf8d; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7697539/fullTextXML
legacy id
lit-b3-049
legacy row
id: lit-b3-049; paper id: akscore-2020; domain id: molecular-interactions; task: Protein–ligand binding affinity scoring; model: AK-score-single; model version: single; learning rate 0.0007; dataset: CASF-2016; dataset version: Not reported; split: Not reported; metric: Pearson R; value: 0.759; unit: unitless; uncertainty: Not reported; protocol: CASF-2016 scoring-power evaluation.; source locator: Table 2, AK-score-single / learning rate 0.0007 row, Scoring Pearson (R) column; source url: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7697539/; evaluation origin: author_reported; reviewed utc: 2026-09-15T23:29:32Z
missing metadata
dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; uncertainty: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
Related records

Suggest a correction