Complex-structure evaluation tests predicted molecular arrangements against experimentally determined structures.
Explanatory profile: source reviewed · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Entity type | Task guide; concrete protocol identities remain separate.SourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Datasets | No single dataset is fixed by this guide. Select a linked protocol and its versioned data release. · Not applicableSourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Organisms | No shared organism population is defined at this guide level. Record it for each selected dataset. · Not applicableSourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Assays | No single measurement assay is fixed by this guide; the endpoint and assay belong to the selected protocol. · Not applicableSourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Splits | No executable split is attached to this task identity. Use the selected protocol’s split manifest. · Not applicableSourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Allowed inputs | Molecular sequences and chemical identities, with templates or alignments only where the protocol permits them; experimental reference structures for scoring.SourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Adaptation | No common fitting regime is imposed here. Keep pretrained, frozen, probed, fine-tuned and conventional methods distinct where applicable. · Not applicableSourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Metrics | Protocol-specific structure and interface measures, such as LDDT, DockQ or interface LDDT. State the assessed entities and aggregation.SourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
| Baselines | Compare structure predictors with matched partner definitions and input information. Different sampling budgets require separate reporting.SourcesAlphaFold 3 paper · Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set |
Conceptual task guide. Dataset preparation, parameters and scoring must come from a separately identified protocol.
Declare the molecular partners and the input information available to each method. Assess the relevant chains and interfaces as well as the whole complex, using an explicit chain-assignment rule. Templates, alignments and sampling budgets belong to the evaluated configuration. A confidence estimate is not an experimental accuracy measurement.
This is a task guide, not a single versioned benchmark protocol. The connected resources provide examples or concrete procedures. A candidate method or proposed control is not evidence that an evaluation has been completed.
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 0 evaluations · 0 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
No evaluations linked in this release.
Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
| Paper or primary resource | Version | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3 | Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256 | Read source |
| CASP16 Protein Monomer Structure Prediction Assessment | Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256 | Read source |
primary protocol reviewed
Reviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol.
Stable record: catalog-task-complex-structureTrace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram caption Conceptual task guide. Dataset preparation, parameters and scoring must come from a separately identified protocol. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Diagram steps ["Fix partners, references and allowed inputs","Predict complete complexes","Match equivalent chains and atoms","Score structures and interfaces"] Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Diagram title Conceptual evaluation workflow Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Entity type Task guide; concrete protocol identities remain separate. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Datasets No single dataset is fixed by this guide. Select a linked protocol and its versioned data release. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | inapplicable automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Organisms No shared organism population is defined at this guide level. Record it for each selected dataset. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | inapplicable automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Assays No single measurement assay is fixed by this guide; the endpoint and assay belong to the selected protocol. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | inapplicable automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Splits No executable split is attached to this task identity. Use the selected protocol’s split manifest. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | inapplicable automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Allowed inputs Molecular sequences and chemical identities, with templates or alignments only where the protocol permits them; experimental reference structures for scoring. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
| Adaptation No common fitting regime is imposed here. Keep pretrained, frozen, probed, fine-tuned and conventional methods distinct where applicable. Individual claims | AlphaFold 3 paper Main text: Model architecture and Model limitations; Methods: Metrics and Recent PDB evaluation set Version: Nature 2024; DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w; XML retrieved 2026-09-16 | inapplicable automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsReviewed named primary documentation and existing protocol records. Editorial task scope is distinguished from source-reported procedures. No model execution or new numerical result; a reviewed guide is not a complete runnable protocol. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: primary_artifact_review |
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: discovered
Stable ID: catalog-task-complex-structure