rewire.it
Task

miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction

miRNA–mRNA interaction classification evaluates paired sequence representations on a benchmark split and an independent collection.

SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

1 evaluation · 1 metric row

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsMirTarRAW positive/negative miRNA–mRNA pairs, plus DeepMirTarLeft.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
SplitsMirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
MetricsF1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
BaselinesDeepMirTar, RNA-FM, RNABERT, RNA-MSM and RNAErnie in the interaction comparison; other RNA-task baselines are separate.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Leakage controlsMirTarRAW is divided 72%/8%/20% for training/validation/test, with DeepMirTarLeft as an additional test set. The RNAret methods do not specify a miRNA-identity, transcript-identity or homology-grouped holdout for this task. The paper’s explicit RNAStrAlign/ArchiveII overlap exclusion belongs to secondary-structure prediction and must not be transferred here. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility
UncertaintyTable 1 reports point classification metrics. RNAret’s Statistics and reproducibility section and Supplementary Information do not specify repeated-run intervals or an uncertainty estimator for miRNA–mRNA prediction. Intervals reported in the original miTAR study would not quantify RNAret’s results. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences; rnaret-2026__42003_2026_9757_MOESM2_ESM.pdf · Table 1; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility; Supplementary Information
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
OrganismsHuman miRNA–target pairs. The original miTAR study identifies its DeepMirTar and miRAW inputs as human datasets; MirTarRAW combines portions of these two datasets and DeepMirTarLeft is the withheld remainder of DeepMirTar.
Sources (2)Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences; PMC7912887.xml · RNAret: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; miTAR: Abstract and Methods/Datasets
AssaysmiRNA–mRNA interaction labels.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Allowed inputsPaired miRNA and mRNA sequences.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
AdaptationSupervised pair classification on the training portion with validation and independent testing.
SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

How it works

How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Paired miRNA and mRNA sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.. Then: 3. Readout: F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Paired miRNA and mRNA sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.. Then: 3. Readout: F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Paired miRNA and mRNA sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.. Then: 3. Readout: F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions
Evaluation methodology

MirTarRAW positive/negative miRNA–mRNA pairs, plus DeepMirTarLeft. MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset. F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification. DeepMirTar, RNA-FM, RNABERT, RNA-MSM and RNAErnie in the interaction comparison; other RNA-task baselines are separate. MirTarRAW is divided 72%/8%/20% for training/validation/test, with DeepMirTarLeft as an additional test set. The RNAret methods do not specify a miRNA-identity, transcript-identity or homology-grouped holdout for this task. The paper’s explicit RNAStrAlign/ArchiveII overlap exclusion belongs to secondary-structure prediction and must not be transferred here.

SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions; Results: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
RNAret: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction

5-mer RNAret classifier; 72/8/20 train/validation/test split

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.9622 F1

Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Table 1, MirTarRAW / 5-mer RNAret row, F1 column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequencesjournal full text in PMCRead source

What is still missing

  • complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.
  • exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.
Search and extraction details

primary comparison tables located

Searches

  • Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences 10.1038/s42003-026-09757-x

Evidence locations

  • Table 1; XML table Tab1

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

Profile review details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Stable record: reported-task-46e927bea10702

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

21 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Input: Paired miRNA and mRNA sequences.","Evaluation: MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.","Readout: F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification."]

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Computational evaluation flow

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets

MirTarRAW positive/negative miRNA–mRNA pairs, plus DeepMirTarLeft.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits

MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation

Supervised pair classification on the training portion with validation and independent testing.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics

F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines

DeepMirTar, RNA-FM, RNABERT, RNA-MSM and RNAErnie in the interaction comparison; other RNA-task baselines are separate.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls

MirTarRAW is divided 72%/8%/20% for training/validation/test, with DeepMirTarLeft as an additional test set. The RNAret methods do not specify a miRNA-identity, transcript-identity or homology-grouped holdout for this task. The paper’s explicit RNAStrAlign/ArchiveII overlap exclusion belongs to secondary-structure prediction and must not be transferred here.

Individual claims
Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences

Original source ↗

Results: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility

Version: journal full text in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:38:57.558224+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e970e7322e07fb3c9d12efd315691cc5de5575a3f2616f4b788614c8c706dd0b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty

Table 1 reports point classification metrics. RNAret’s Statistics and reproducibility section and Supplementary Information do not specify repeated-run intervals or an uncertainty estimator for miRNA–mRNA prediction. Intervals reported in the original miTAR study would not quantify RNAret’s results.

Individual claims
rnaret-2026__42003_2026_9757_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Original source ↗

Table 1; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility; Supplementary Information

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: Retrieved 2026-09-16; sha256:8464ff052a60b946bd08fa18860f22b2f390fe93dd0549eb845c8e9a68cf5fcc
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:06:05.136898+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 8464ff052a60b946bd08fa18860f22b2f390fe93dd0549eb845c8e9a68cf5fcc

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Archive member: 42003_2026_9757_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

4 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-46e927bea10702

areas
rna-transcriptomes
tasks
miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: primary_comparison_tables_located; primary sources: evidence-expansion-rnaret-2026-e970e732; inspected locators: Table 1; XML table Tab1; searched queries: Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences 10.1038/s42003-026-09757-x; gaps: complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.; exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.; claim scope: Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: rnaret-2026; source locator: Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction