Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
miRNA–mRNA interaction classification evaluates paired sequence representations on a benchmark split and an independent collection.
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Datasets | MirTarRAW positive/negative miRNA–mRNA pairs, plus DeepMirTarLeft.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Splits | MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Metrics | F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Baselines | DeepMirTar, RNA-FM, RNABERT, RNA-MSM and RNAErnie in the interaction comparison; other RNA-task baselines are separate.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Leakage controls | MirTarRAW is divided 72%/8%/20% for training/validation/test, with DeepMirTarLeft as an additional test set. The RNAret methods do not specify a miRNA-identity, transcript-identity or homology-grouped holdout for this task. The paper’s explicit RNAStrAlign/ArchiveII overlap exclusion belongs to secondary-structure prediction and must not be transferred here. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility |
| Uncertainty | Table 1 reports point classification metrics. RNAret’s Statistics and reproducibility section and Supplementary Information do not specify repeated-run intervals or an uncertainty estimator for miRNA–mRNA prediction. Intervals reported in the original miTAR study would not quantify RNAret’s results. · Not reported in inspected sourcesSources (2)Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences; rnaret-2026__42003_2026_9757_MOESM2_ESM.pdf · Table 1; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility; Supplementary Information |
| Entity type | Paper-specific computational evaluation protocol.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Organisms | Human miRNA–target pairs. The original miTAR study identifies its DeepMirTar and miRAW inputs as human datasets; MirTarRAW combines portions of these two datasets and DeepMirTarLeft is the withheld remainder of DeepMirTar.Sources (2)Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences; PMC7912887.xml · RNAret: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; miTAR: Abstract and Methods/Datasets |
| Assays | miRNA–mRNA interaction labels.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Allowed inputs | Paired miRNA and mRNA sequences.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
| Adaptation | Supervised pair classification on the training portion with validation and independent testing.SourcesRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions |
Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.
MirTarRAW positive/negative miRNA–mRNA pairs, plus DeepMirTarLeft. MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset. F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification. DeepMirTar, RNA-FM, RNABERT, RNA-MSM and RNAErnie in the interaction comparison; other RNA-task baselines are separate. MirTarRAW is divided 72%/8%/20% for training/validation/test, with DeepMirTarLeft as an additional test set. The RNAret methods do not specify a miRNA-identity, transcript-identity or homology-grouped holdout for this task. The paper’s explicit RNAStrAlign/ArchiveII overlap exclusion belongs to secondary-structure prediction and must not be transferred here.
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| RNAret: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction 5-mer RNAret classifier; 72/8/20 train/validation/test split Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.9622 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedRetentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences · Table 1, MirTarRAW / 5-mer RNAret row, F1 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
| Paper or primary resource | Version | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences | journal full text in PMC | Read source |
primary comparison tables located
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Targeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change.
Stable record: reported-task-46e927bea10702Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
21 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram caption Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram steps ["Input: Paired miRNA and mRNA sequences.","Evaluation: MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset.","Readout: F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification."] Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Diagram title Computational evaluation flow Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Datasets MirTarRAW positive/negative miRNA–mRNA pairs, plus DeepMirTarLeft. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Splits MirTarRAW is partitioned 72:8:20 for training, validation and testing; DeepMirTarLeft is an additional independent dataset. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Adaptation Supervised pair classification on the training portion with validation and independent testing. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Metrics F1, precision, recall, accuracy and AUC for miRNA–mRNA interaction classification. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Baselines DeepMirTar, RNA-FM, RNABERT, RNA-MSM and RNAErnie in the interaction comparison; other RNA-task baselines are separate. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: RNA–RNA interaction task; Methods: RNA–RNA interaction prediction; cached text lines 17, 79; task metric definitions and corresponding results table; matching task comparison table/ablation captions Version: journal full text in PMC | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Leakage controls MirTarRAW is divided 72%/8%/20% for training/validation/test, with DeepMirTarLeft as an additional test set. The RNAret methods do not specify a miRNA-identity, transcript-identity or homology-grouped holdout for this task. The paper’s explicit RNAStrAlign/ArchiveII overlap exclusion belongs to secondary-structure prediction and must not be transferred here. Individual claims | Retentive Network promotes efficient RNA language modeling of long sequences Results: miRNA-mRNA interaction prediction; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility Version: journal full text in PMC | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Uncertainty Table 1 reports point classification metrics. RNAret’s Statistics and reproducibility section and Supplementary Information do not specify repeated-run intervals or an uncertainty estimator for miRNA–mRNA prediction. Intervals reported in the original miTAR study would not quantify RNAret’s results. Individual claims | rnaret-2026__42003_2026_9757_MOESM2_ESM.pdf Table 1; Methods: Statistics and reproducibility; Supplementary Information Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Retrieved 2026-09-16; sha256:8464ff052a60b946bd08fa18860f22b2f390fe93dd0549eb845c8e9a68cf5fcc | unreported automated source review · 2026-09-16 Audit detailsTargeted full-paper and supplement review of the outstanding task fields, with original dataset metadata checked where accessible. Source-scoped omissions are explicit; no independent benchmark reproduction or numerical-result change. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Archive member: 42003_2026_9757_MOESM2_ESM.pdf |
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-46e927bea10702