This paper-specific evaluation tests CAMI II phylum read classification using CAMI II Sample_0 10,000-read subsample.
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. This does not change the review status of its results.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Record type | Paper-specific task; protocol incompletely extractedNormalized compression distance for DNA classification · Table 5, NCD Phylum row, F1 column |
| Inputs | CAMI II Sample_0 10,000-read subsampleNormalized compression distance for DNA classification · Table 5, NCD Phylum row, F1 column |
| Assessment | Macro F1Normalized compression distance for DNA classification · Table 5, NCD Phylum row, F1 column |
| Recorded split or evaluation setting | UnextractedNormalized compression distance for DNA classification · Table 5, NCD Phylum row, F1 column |
| Datasets | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Organisms | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Assays | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Adaptation | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Baselines | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Outline of the existing paper extraction. Split membership, fitting details and scorer implementation remain incompletely reviewed.
The existing paper extraction describes: Phylum-level macro-averaged F1; distinct taxonomic rank from the other row. This description is retained with the exact evaluation records; it is not a new protocol reconstruction.
Normalized compression distance for DNA classification · Table 5, NCD Phylum row, F1 columnRelease 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| NCD-gzip: CAMI II phylum read classification Model: NCD-gzip · Benchmark: CAMI II phylum read classification · Dataset: CAMI II Sample_0 10,000-read subsample Phylum-level macro-averaged F1; distinct taxonomic rank from the other row. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.1263 Macro F1 Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedNormalized compression distance for DNA classification · Table 5, NCD Phylum row, F1 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Catalogue extraction inspected; protocol claims remain limited to the cited evidence. Missing details are not presumed absent from the original paper.
Stable record: reported-task-45105e1c486251Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-45105e1c486251