This paper-specific evaluation tests Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence using GenomeOcean natural/artificial sequence test.
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. This does not change the review status of its results.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Record type | Paper-specific task; protocol incompletely extractedGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column; Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 column |
| Inputs | GenomeOcean natural/artificial sequence testGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column; Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 column |
| Assessment | F1GenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column; Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 column |
| Recorded split or evaluation setting | UnextractedGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column; Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 column |
| Datasets | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Organisms | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Assays | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Adaptation | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Baselines | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Outline of the existing paper extraction. Split membership, fitting details and scorer implementation remain incompletely reviewed.
The existing paper extraction describes: Source reports natural-versus-artificial sequence classification. This description is retained with the exact evaluation records; it is not a new protocol reconstruction.
GenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column; Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 columnRelease 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| GenomeOcean: Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence Model: GenomeOcean · Benchmark: Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence · Dataset: GenomeOcean natural/artificial sequence test Source reports natural-versus-artificial sequence classification. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 99.03 F1 Unit: % · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| DNABERT-2: Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence Model: DNABERT-2 · Benchmark: Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence · Dataset: GenomeOcean natural/artificial sequence test Source reports natural-versus-artificial sequence classification. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 85.12 F1 Unit: % · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Catalogue extraction inspected; protocol claims remain limited to the cited evidence. Missing details are not presumed absent from the original paper.
Stable record: reported-task-9f9ab0090f6522Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: reported-task-9f9ab0090f6522