rewire.it
dataset · needs review

GenomeOcean natural/artificial sequence test

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
GenomeOcean: Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence

Source reports natural-versus-artificial sequence classification.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

99.03 F1

Unit: % · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, GenomeOcean row, F1 column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DNABERT-2: Natural vs artificial microbial genome sequence

Source reports natural-versus-artificial sequence classification.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

85.12 F1

Unit: % · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedGenomeOcean: An Efficient Genome Foundation Model Trained on Large-Scale Metagenomic Assemblies · Table 2, DNABERT-2 row, F1 column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-dataset-0c3ac7efe99c37

areas
microbes-communities
version
Not reported
split
Not reported
missing metadata
version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; accession: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
Related records

Suggest a correction