CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves
CNN (Jores et al.) as evaluated in the AgroNT paper on the original study's data. Exact fitted checkpoint is unreported.
Overview
CNN (Jores et al.) as evaluated in the AgroNT paper on the original study's data. Exact fitted checkpoint is unreported.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
3 evaluations · 3 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves | Protocol: PGB promoter strength tobacco leaves: A. thaliana: promoter strength prediction Dataset subset: promoter strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: A. thaliana (PGB promoter strength split) | 0.57 r2 coefficient of determination · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedMethods, coverage and source170 bp assay sequences; original study train/test datasets, as described in Methods Sec21. R² is scored separately by assay system and sequence class. Fitted model checkpoint, seeds and scored counts are not established here. Aggregation: Not reported AgroNT Figure 3e source table · Figures/Fig3_panele.txt, line 11 (data row 10), column R2; Species=A. thaliana; Model=Tobacco model; Type=CNN (Jores et al.) |
| Configuration: CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves | Protocol: PGB promoter strength tobacco leaves: S. bicolor: promoter strength prediction Dataset subset: promoter strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: S. bicolor (PGB promoter strength split) | 0.71 r2 coefficient of determination · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedMethods, coverage and source170 bp assay sequences; original study train/test datasets, as described in Methods Sec21. R² is scored separately by assay system and sequence class. Fitted model checkpoint, seeds and scored counts are not established here. Aggregation: Not reported AgroNT Figure 3e source table · Figures/Fig3_panele.txt, line 12 (data row 11), column R2; Species=S. bicolor; Model=Tobacco model; Type=CNN (Jores et al.) |
| Configuration: CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves | Protocol: PGB promoter strength tobacco leaves: Z. mays: promoter strength prediction Dataset subset: promoter strength test sequences: tobacco leaves: Z. mays (PGB promoter strength split) | 0.73 r2 coefficient of determination · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedMethods, coverage and source170 bp assay sequences; original study train/test datasets, as described in Methods Sec21. R² is scored separately by assay system and sequence class. Fitted model checkpoint, seeds and scored counts are not established here. Aggregation: Not reported AgroNT Figure 3e source table · Figures/Fig3_panele.txt, line 13 (data row 12), column R2; Species=Z. mays; Model=Tobacco model; Type=CNN (Jores et al.) |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-23-2b89723c6dd9 · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- AgroNT Figure 3e source table · Original source · 78ec8156c2ffb3e5475277fdb7eb603294224e53
- AgroNT: published methods and Figure 3 · Original source · Version of record, 2024-07-09; retrieved XML snapshot
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: agront-2024-fig3e-method-cnn-jores-et-al-promoter-strength-tobacco-leaves
- areas
- genomics
- source locator
- Fig3_panele.txt, Type=CNN (Jores et al.), Model=Tobacco model; Methods: Fine-tuning strategy (Sec16), Promoter and terminator strength prediction (Sec21); Figure 3 caption
- missing metadata
- checkpoint revision: unreported; parameters: unextracted
Related records
- model: CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves on PGB promoter strength tobacco leaves: A. thaliana: promoter strength prediction
- model: CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves on PGB promoter strength tobacco leaves: S. bicolor: promoter strength prediction
- model: CNN (Jores et al.): promoter strength, tobacco leaves on PGB promoter strength tobacco leaves: Z. mays: promoter strength prediction