rewire.it
Configuration

iPro70-FMWin

iPro70-FMWin is an established σ70 promoter predictor used as a webserver comparator in the CyaPromBERT paper.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

1 evaluation · 1 metric row

How it worksEvaluated procedure (conceptual)
Evaluated procedure (conceptual)1. E. coli σ70 promoter/non-promoter DNA windows. Then: 2. iPro70-FMWin. Then: 3. Promoter probabilities and class predictionsEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. E. coli σ70 promoter/non-promoter DNA windows. Then: 2. iPro70-FMWin. Then: 3. Promoter probabilities and class predictionsEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. E. coli σ70 promoter/non-promoter DNA windows. Then: 2. iPro70-FMWin. Then: 3. Promoter probabilities and class predictions

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

At a glance

Model type

Study-specific predictive method; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
iPro70-FMWin: E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction

Compared on the same independent test dataset; 110 promoters and 108 non-promoters.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.90 Promoter-class F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · TABLE 3, iPro70-FMWin row, F1 score Promoter column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

How it works

How the evaluated method works

The original method extracts multi-window sequence features and uses AdaBoost-based feature selection, retaining 27 common features from 22,595 candidates before classifier evaluation. The CyaPromBERT study calls the existing server and uses its returned probabilities.

SourcesiPro70-FMWin original paper · Materials and methods / Benchmark dataset; Feature selection
What was evaluated

The linked evaluation record identifies iPro70-FMWin: E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction. Its dataset, split, adaptation and evidence origin remain attached to the reported results.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · The named evaluation’s methods and comparison table; exact preserved evaluation IDs: evaluation-lit-036

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

Limitations and conditions

Profile review details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Stable record: reported-model-23cb15b93c00ff

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeStudy-specific predictive method; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)
Architecture / procedureThe original method extracts multi-window sequence features and uses AdaBoost-based feature selection, retaining 27 common features from 22,595 candidates before classifier evaluation. The CyaPromBERT study calls the existing server and uses its returned probabilities.
SourcesiPro70-FMWin original paper · Materials and methods / Benchmark dataset; Feature selection
Biological inputsE. coli σ70 promoter/non-promoter DNA windows
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Materials and methods/Datasets (paragraph 2); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 1)
OutputsPromoter probabilities and class predictions
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Materials and methods/Datasets (paragraph 2); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 1)
ParametersA neural parameter count is inapplicable. The original feature-selection procedure retains 27 features; the later server’s fitted classifier artifact is not pinned. · Not applicable
SourcesiPro70-FMWin original paper · Materials and methods / Feature selection
Known versions / configurationiPro70-FMWin is the comparison-table label; that label does not specify an immutable weight revision. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Model identification in the comparison table and corresponding Methods; immutable checkpoint revision is not supplied by the table label.
Training data / fittingThe original method paper uses 2,141 E. coli K-12 sequences from a RegulonDB 9.0-derived collection, including 741 σ70 promoters, with cross-validation. This is the underlying method’s training description; the later server build is not pinned.
SourcesiPro70-FMWin original paper · Materials and methods / Benchmark dataset; Feature selection
Context limits81-bp windows spanning 60 bases upstream and 20 downstream of the transcription start site.
SourcesiPro70-FMWin original paper · Materials and methods / Benchmark dataset
AccessOfficial study implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/hanepira/TSSnote-CyaPromBert/blob/e86f5449e2e2af3fead1b418ba721f38feb61318/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.
Sourceshanepira/TSSnote-CyaPromBert README.md · README.md; installation, model download and usage instructions
Code licenceNo explicit code licence was established from the paper’s availability statement and inspected repository-root documentation. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sourceshanepira/TSSnote-CyaPromBert README.md · README.md and repository-root licence-file search
Weights licenceThe inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sourceshanepira/TSSnote-CyaPromBert README.md · README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

19 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["E. coli σ70 promoter/non-promoter DNA windows","iPro70-FMWin","Promoter probabilities and class predictions"]

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Evaluated procedure (conceptual)

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Model type

Study-specific predictive method; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Architecture / procedure

The original method extracts multi-window sequence features and uses AdaBoost-based feature selection, retaining 27 common features from 22,595 candidates before classifier evaluation. The CyaPromBERT study calls the existing server and uses its returned probabilities.

Individual claims
iPro70-FMWin original paper

Original source ↗

Materials and methods / Benchmark dataset; Feature selection

Version: 10.1007/s00438-018-1487-5
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:40:28.842295+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e4fa53c5574961acf4a93bf251b71c248025c64b1b79e74da40ff73091d8b205

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Weights licence

The inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately.

Individual claims
hanepira/TSSnote-CyaPromBert README.md

Original source ↗

README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope

Version: e86f5449e2e2af3fead1b418ba721f38feb61318
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:54:13.729708+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: c916c6c99b07fa3a440264eeefeac8a6b1508867da31c7233bc4d24367fd8bbd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Biological inputs

E. coli σ70 promoter/non-promoter DNA windows

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Datasets (paragraph 2); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Outputs

Promoter probabilities and class predictions

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Datasets (paragraph 2); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Parameters

A neural parameter count is inapplicable. The original feature-selection procedure retains 27 features; the later server’s fitted classifier artifact is not pinned.

Individual claims
iPro70-FMWin original paper

Original source ↗

Materials and methods / Feature selection

Version: 10.1007/s00438-018-1487-5
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T20:40:28.842295+00:00

inapplicable

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: e4fa53c5574961acf4a93bf251b71c248025c64b1b79e74da40ff73091d8b205

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Known versions / configuration

iPro70-FMWin is the comparison-table label; that label does not specify an immutable weight revision.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Model identification in the comparison table and corresponding Methods; immutable checkpoint revision is not supplied by the table label.

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

3 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-model-23cb15b93c00ff

areas
microbes-communities
entity level
method
version
Not reported
reported name
iPro70-FMWin
historical missing metadata
version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; checkpoint revision: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; training data: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; licence: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: evidence-reported-ipro70-original; cyaprombert-2022; source locator: Materials and methods / Benchmark dataset; Feature selection | Materials and methods/Model training (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2) | Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 3); Results and discussion/Evaluating model performance compared to existing promoter prediction models using independent datasets from E. coli (paragraph 2); ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.
Related records

Suggest a correction