rewire.it
Task

E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction

The E. coli promoter benchmark is an independent comparison within a broader promoter-prediction paper.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

2 evaluations · 2 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsIndependent E. coli promoter datasets linked to the chenli-bioinfo/promoter repository.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
SplitsThe E. coli comparison uses the independent σ70-promoter dataset from the linked Zhang/chenli-bioinfo study and reports class support in Table 3. The E. coli subsection does not specify the exact training/test file allocation; cyanobacterial cross-species partitions elsewhere are not its split definition. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Results: independent E. coli benchmarking; Table 3
MetricsPrecision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
BaselinesiPro70-FMWin and iPromoter-2L2.0 evaluated on the independent E. coli sigma70 benchmark.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
Leakage controlsThe checked E. coli comparison identifies an independent dataset but does not specify sequence/homology overlap checks against comparator training data. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
UncertaintyThe cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
OrganismsEscherichia coli for this sigma70 task; cyanobacterial tasks elsewhere in the paper are separate.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
AssaysCurated sigma70 promoter/non-promoter labels.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
Allowed inputsDNA promoter-window sequences.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
AdaptationBERT-based supervised classification trained on the E. coli benchmark; evaluated against existing promoter web servers.
SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

How it works

How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA promoter-window sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: BERT-based supervised classification trained on the E. coli benchmark; evaluated against existing promoter web servers.. Then: 3. Readout: Precision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA promoter-window sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: BERT-based supervised classification trained on the E. coli benchmark; evaluated against existing promoter web servers.. Then: 3. Readout: Precision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: DNA promoter-window sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: BERT-based supervised classification trained on the E. coli benchmark; evaluated against existing promoter web servers.. Then: 3. Readout: Precision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages
Evaluation methodology

Independent E. coli promoter datasets linked to the chenli-bioinfo/promoter repository. Precision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods. iPro70-FMWin and iPromoter-2L2.0 evaluated on the independent E. coli sigma70 benchmark. The checked E. coli comparison identifies an independent dataset but does not specify sequence/homology overlap checks against comparator training data. The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.

SourcesTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Eco70PromBERT: E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction

BERT-base with 1bp tokenizer; 110 promoters and 108 non-promoters.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.91 Promoter-class F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · TABLE 3, Eco70PromBERT (BERT-base + 1bp tokenizer) row, F1 score Promoter column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

iPro70-FMWin: E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction

Compared on the same independent test dataset; 110 promoters and 108 non-promoters.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.90 Promoter-class F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedTSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT · TABLE 3, iPro70-FMWin row, F1 score Promoter column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.

What is still missing

  • complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.
  • exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.
Search and extraction details

primary comparison tables located

Searches

  • TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT 10.3389/fgene.2022.1067562

Evidence locations

  • TABLE 3; XML table T3

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

Profile review details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Stable record: reported-task-e5c34f686ac403

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Input: DNA promoter-window sequences.","Evaluation: BERT-based supervised classification trained on the E. coli benchmark; evaluated against existing promoter web servers.","Readout: Precision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods."]

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Computational evaluation flow

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets

Independent E. coli promoter datasets linked to the chenli-bioinfo/promoter repository.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits

The E. coli comparison uses the independent σ70-promoter dataset from the linked Zhang/chenli-bioinfo study and reports class support in Table 3. The E. coli subsection does not specify the exact training/test file allocation; cyanobacterial cross-species partitions elsewhere are not its split definition.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Results: independent E. coli benchmarking; Table 3

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation

BERT-based supervised classification trained on the E. coli benchmark; evaluated against existing promoter web servers.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics

Precision, recall, F1, AUROC and average-precision-based AUPRC are described in the evaluation methods.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines

iPro70-FMWin and iPromoter-2L2.0 evaluated on the independent E. coli sigma70 benchmark.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls

The checked E. coli comparison identifies an independent dataset but does not specify sequence/homology overlap checks against comparator training data.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty

The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.

Individual claims
TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Original source ↗

Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.544033+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 74278ccd77b2bc00a3f4434546545e8bdec8b0652a0e5d1862ec0f91decccd8d

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-e5c34f686ac403

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
E. coli sigma70 promoter prediction
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: primary_comparison_tables_located; primary sources: evidence-expansion-cyaprombert-2022-74278ccd; inspected locators: TABLE 3; XML table T3; searched queries: TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT 10.3389/fgene.2022.1067562; gaps: complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.; exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.; claim scope: Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: cyaprombert-2022; source locator: Datasets; Evaluation criteria; Results: independent datasets from E. coli; cached text lines 12, 28–30, 42; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction