rewire.it
Configuration

MINGLE

MINGLE is a mutual-information-based scATAC-seq annotation comparator in the scLLMDA study.

SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the global consistency relationship of each graph. (paragraph 5); Discussion (paragraph 1)

1 evaluation · 1 metric row

How it worksEvaluated procedure (conceptual)
Evaluated procedure (conceptual)1. scATAC-seq accessibility data and reference cell annotations. Then: 2. MINGLE. Then: 3. Cell-type annotationsEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. scATAC-seq accessibility data and reference cell annotations. Then: 2. MINGLE. Then: 3. Cell-type annotationsEvaluated procedure (conceptual)1. scATAC-seq accessibility data and reference cell annotations. Then: 2. MINGLE. Then: 3. Cell-type annotations

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)

At a glance

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
MINGLE: Cross-platform scATAC cell-type annotation

Cross-platform reference-query comparator.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.6256 F1

Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Table 2, MINGLE row, Ref: MosA1 / Q: WholeBrainA F1 column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

How it works

How the evaluated method works

The method combines cell similarity and topological structure to transfer cell labels; the comparison uses common preprocessing.

SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)
What was evaluated

The linked evaluation record identifies MINGLE: Cross-platform scATAC cell-type annotation. Its dataset, split, adaptation and evidence origin remain attached to the reported results.

SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · The named evaluation’s methods and comparison table; exact preserved evaluation IDs: evaluation-lit-b3-006

Strengths and limitations

Profile review details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Stable record: reported-model-f0c630d0565e64

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeStudy-specific predictive method; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.
SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)
Architecture / procedureThe method combines cell similarity and topological structure to transfer cell labels; the comparison uses common preprocessing.
SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)
Biological inputsscATAC-seq accessibility data and reference cell annotations
SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods/Feature extraction from genomic sequences (paragraph 4); Introduction (paragraph 1)
OutputsCell-type annotations
SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 5); Results/Intra-platform cell type annotation (paragraph 2)
ParametersAn aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation; sheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md · Materials and methods/Benchmark datasets; Materials and methods/Benchmark methods; Materials and methods/Problem definition; Materials and methods/Feature extraction from genomic sequences; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Graph construction.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the local consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the global consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Feature fusion via attention.; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision
Known versions / configurationMINGLE is the comparison-table label; that label does not specify an immutable weight revision. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Model identification in the comparison table and corresponding Methods; immutable checkpoint revision is not supplied by the table label.
Training data / fittingTrain on each stated reference scATAC-seq dataset and evaluate transfer to its query dataset. The benchmark states that all methods use SANGO’s preprocessing pipeline; MINGLE-specific optimisation details are not restated.
SourcesCell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation · Materials and methods / Benchmark methods; Tables 1–3
Context limitsA maximum input/context length for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sources (2)Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation; sheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md · Materials and methods/Benchmark datasets; Materials and methods/Benchmark methods; Materials and methods/Problem definition; Materials and methods/Feature extraction from genomic sequences; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Graph construction.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the local consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the global consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Feature fusion via attention.; inspected for explicit maximum input length (dataset lengths and family-wide limits are not substituted); README.md at pinned repository revision
AccessOfficial study implementation and usage documentation: https://github.com/sheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA/blob/5e24025710bb068312d50a5749ef6bb838ef5a32/README.md. This pinned documentation revision is not automatically the evaluated weight revision.
Sourcessheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md · README.md; installation, model download and usage instructions
Code licenceNo explicit code licence was established from the paper’s availability statement and inspected repository-root documentation. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sourcessheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md · README.md and repository-root licence-file search
Weights licenceThe inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately. · Not reported in inspected sources
Sourcessheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md · README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

21 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual input–method–output guide. Check the procedure text and linked evaluation for fitted components, additional inputs and exact settings.

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["scATAC-seq accessibility data and reference cell annotations","MINGLE","Cell-type annotations"]

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Evaluated procedure (conceptual)

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Model type

Study-specific predictive method; this record is the paper-specific evaluated configuration.

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Architecture / procedure

The method combines cell similarity and topological structure to transfer cell labels; the comparison uses common preprocessing.

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Weights licence

The inspected model-access documentation does not explicitly identify terms for this exact evaluated checkpoint or fitted head; repository code terms are shown separately.

Individual claims
sheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md

Original source ↗

README.md; checkpoint/access documentation and licence scope

Version: 5e24025710bb068312d50a5749ef6bb838ef5a32
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:54:22.541360+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: b8327f7bbd867d6e5b7ab369873b59aeba64fe4ca79c879dd54c3b036b127d3b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Biological inputs

scATAC-seq accessibility data and reference cell annotations

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Feature extraction from genomic sequences (paragraph 4); Introduction (paragraph 1)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Outputs

Cell-type annotations

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 5); Results/Intra-platform cell type annotation (paragraph 2)

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Parameters

An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources.

Individual claims
sheng-guan-2001/scLLMDA README.md

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark datasets; Materials and methods/Benchmark methods; Materials and methods/Problem definition; Materials and methods/Feature extraction from genomic sequences; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Graph construction.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the local consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the global consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Feature fusion via attention.; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 5e24025710bb068312d50a5749ef6bb838ef5a32
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T19:54:22.541360+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: b8327f7bbd867d6e5b7ab369873b59aeba64fe4ca79c879dd54c3b036b127d3b

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Parameters

An aggregate parameter total for this exact evaluated configuration is not established by the inspected sources.

Individual claims
Cell type annotation for scATAC-seq via DNA large language model and graph domain adaptation

Original source ↗

Materials and methods/Benchmark datasets; Materials and methods/Benchmark methods; Materials and methods/Problem definition; Materials and methods/Feature extraction from genomic sequences; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Graph construction.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the local consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the global consistency relationship of each graph.; Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Feature fusion via attention.; inspected for aggregate parameter count (component sizes are not added without an exact configuration); README.md at pinned repository revision

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:44:03.395850+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Primary full text and the available official implementation/model documentation were inspected. Explanatory claims are source-backed; unresolved exact-configuration metadata is labelled explicitly. This is automated review, not a human review or independent benchmark reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: f1cdc7d54c6b2d491e4a74a44a1188a3679c555262c988e95a1c0de4614fe3cb

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-model-f0c630d0565e64

areas
cells-tissues
entity level
method
version
Not reported
reported name
MINGLE
historical missing metadata
version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; checkpoint revision: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; training data: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; licence: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: scatac-llmda-2026; source locator: Materials and methods/Benchmark methods (paragraph 1); Results/UMAP visualization comparison across methods (paragraph 1) | Materials and methods/Cell type annotation via graph domain adaptation/Capture the global consistency relationship of each graph. (paragraph 5); Discussion (paragraph 1); ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.
Related records

Suggest a correction