rewire.it
Dataset

Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 7 evaluations · 21 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Sourmash: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.932 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Sourmash, column F1 score; XML row6 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.927 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Sourmash, column Recall; XML row6 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.938 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Sourmash, column Precision; XML row6 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Lemur + Magnet: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.950 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur + Magnet, column Precision; XML row3 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.938 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur + Magnet, column F1 score; XML row3 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.927 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur + Magnet, column Recall; XML row3 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Kraken 2: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.055 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Kraken 2, column Precision; XML row8 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.976 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Kraken 2, column Recall; XML row8 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.104 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Kraken 2, column F1 score; XML row8 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Lemur: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.703 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur, column Precision; XML row2 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.808 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur, column F1 score; XML row2 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.951 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur, column Recall; XML row2 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Melon: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.946 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Melon, column F1 score; XML row4 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.929 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Melon, column Precision; XML row4 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.963 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Melon, column Recall; XML row4 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Centrifuger: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.774 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Centrifuger, column Recall; XML row7 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.050 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Centrifuger, column Precision; XML row7 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.093 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Centrifuger, column F1 score; XML row7 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

MetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.862 Precision

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Precision; XML row5 column3

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

1.000 Recall

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.926 F1 score

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedLightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column F1 score; XML row5 column4

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.reported_population

No value recorded

Context-only references
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet

Original source ↗

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:16.880151+00:00

missing or unspecified

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.reported_population

Source artifact SHA-256: 4afb9195da447916eb6f733816e3640741c7ade08ea8920d205c3be7b3cce27a

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Context-only references
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet

Original source ↗

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:16.880151+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 4afb9195da447916eb6f733816e3640741c7ade08ea8920d205c3be7b3cce27a

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

attributes.split

200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.

Context-only references
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet

Original source ↗

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:16.880151+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 4afb9195da447916eb6f733816e3640741c7ade08ea8920d205c3be7b3cce27a

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

attributes.subset

Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Context-only references
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet

Original source ↗

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:16.880151+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.subset

Source artifact SHA-256: 4afb9195da447916eb6f733816e3640741c7ade08ea8920d205c3be7b3cce27a

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

description

Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.

Context-only references
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet

Original source ↗

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:16.880151+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 4afb9195da447916eb6f733816e3640741c7ade08ea8920d205c3be7b3cce27a

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

name

Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Context-only references
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet

Original source ↗

Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads

Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:16.880151+00:00

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 4afb9195da447916eb6f733816e3640741c7ade08ea8920d205c3be7b3cce27a

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-dataset-e8eb310c5d40e647ac

areas
microbes-communities
tasks
Long-read taxonomic profiling
split
200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp.
subset
Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads
reported population
Not reported
source locator
Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads
missing metadata
manifest: unextracted; scored count: unreported
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This record identifies a biological data collection or source-labelled evaluation cohort. Keep its dataset identity; split, assay, taxonomic level, candidate restrictions and comparison context remain attributes rather than automatically becoming new entity kinds.; source ids: part2-lemur-magnet-2024; source locator: Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records

Suggest a correction