dataset · needs review
stimulated immune PBMC
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| scGen: differentially expressed gene identification Model: scGen · Benchmark: differentially expressed gene identification · Dataset: stimulated immune PBMC In-silico perturbation assessment with precision sampled at fixed 50% recall Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.91 precision at 50% recall Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedAUPRC: a metric for evaluating the performance of in-silico perturbation methods in identifying differentially expressed genes · Table 3, CD14+Mono section, scGen row, Precision at 50% Recall column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
- AUPRC: a metric for evaluating the performance of in-silico perturbation methods in identifying differentially expressed genes · Original source · PMC archival version PMC12400816.1
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: reported-dataset-7bf2cf7d2b2d01
- areas
- cells-tissues
- version
- Not reported
- split
- CD14+Mono
- missing metadata
- version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; accession: not_reported_in_legacy_extract